Disposed

D. Pandian v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC10 Jul 2015WP(MD)/21276/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking a legal heir certificate. The Court directed the petitioner to submit a proper application with documentary evidence within two weeks, after which the respondent would decide on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit proper application with evidence within two weeks; respondent to consider and decide on merits within four weeks.

D. Pandian Vs the Tahsildar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.07.2015

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.21276 of 2014

D.Pandian

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Tahsildar, Taluk Office (East), Dindigul, Dindigul District. ... Respondent

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue the legal heir certificate to the petitioner within a time fixed by this Court based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.11.2014.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Govt. Pleader

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This writ petition has been filed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue the legal heir certificate to the petitioner within a time frame, based on the petitioner's representation dated 12.11.2014.

¶15

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no rival claim, and seeks the indulgence of this Court for a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.11.2014 on merits and in accordance with law, which was made for issuing Legal Heirship Certificate to the petitioner.

¶16

3.The learned Additional Govt. Pleader took notice for the respondent and submitted that the petitioner has not submitted any application in the statutory form.

¶17

4.Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶18

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner is directed to submit a proper application along with all the required documentary evidence, to the respondent, within a

¶19

¶20

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such application being made, the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks therefrom.

¶21

6.With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(writ)

¶24

/TRUE COPY/

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

To The Tahsildar, Taluk Office (East), Dindigul, Dindigul District.

¶27

CC TO MR.T.SElVAN, ADVOCATE, SR NO:37953

¶28

¶29

JAM:27.7.2015: 2P/3C

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.21276 of 2014 10.07.2015

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D. Pandian v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D. Pandian v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. Malayalam, Vs the District Revenue

M.Punitha, W/O Manoharan, Vs the District Registrar

K.Ponniah Vs the District Collector

R. Sivanthi Vs the Tahsildar

V.Rajangam Vs the Tahsildar

R.Mohamed Rajapdeen Vs the Commissioner