Disposed

C. Murugaprabhu, v. the Inspector General

Madras HC21 Apr 2015WP(MD)/17785/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench, disposed of a writ petition by directing the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding an upgrade application on merits without adjudicating the underlying merits themselves.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.10.2014 on merits within two months.

C. Murugaprabhu, Vs the Inspector General — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.04.2015 CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶4

WRIT PETITION (MD) No.17785 of 2014

¶5

C.Murugaprabhu ... Petitioner

¶6

-vs-

¶7

The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.

¶8

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶10

The Inspector of Police, Avaniapuram Police Station, Madurai District, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to upgrade the petitioner to the post of Grade-I Police Constable from the first succeeding month from the date of completion of ten years of petitioner's service and consequently pay all the attendant benefits to him.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja For Respondent : Mr.S.Kumar Addl. Govt. Pleader

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition, seeking a direction to the respondents to upgrade him to the post of Grade-I Police Constable from the first succeeding month from the date of completion of his ten years of service with pay and all other attendant benefits.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner would make a plea that if the representation of the petitioner dated 08.10.2014, forwarded to the third respondent is disposed of and suitable orders passed thereon, the grievance of the petitioner would be redressed.

¶16

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the third respondent, without adverting into the merits of the case, is directed to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 08.10.2014 on merits and in accordance with law and after affording an opportunity of hearing to him, pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If on a specified date the petitioner does not appear for personal hearing, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ suitable orders may be passed on merits based on the available records after recording the absence of the petitioner.

¶17

¶18

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. SD/Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

To: 1. The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.

¶21

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai.

¶22

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶23

1. The Inspector of Police, Avaniapuram Police Station, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶24

+1cc to MR.D.SADUQ RAJA,ADVOCATE IN SR NO.20643 +1CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR NO.20721

¶25

WRIT PETITION (MD) No.17785 of 2014 21.04.2015

¶26

RG.28.04.2015 2P/7C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C. Murugaprabhu, v. the Inspector General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C. Murugaprabhu, v. the Inspector General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Reena Rose, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

E. Ramakrishnan, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M. Arumuganainar, Vs the Secretary to Govt.

P.Thangamani, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

S. Gnanasekaran, Vs the Principal Secretary /

K. Palanichamy Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep by