Disposed

Tamilnadu Civil Supplies v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC7 Jul 2015WP(MD)/11414/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the High Court directed the Tamil Nadu State to dispose of a representation regarding a pay scale revision for Trade Union members within three months, hearing them first.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Principal Secretary to dispose of the representation dated 22.04.2015 within three months after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.

Tamilnadu Civil Supplies Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 07.07.2015

¶4

Coram

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.11414 of 2015

¶7

Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ministerial Technical Loadman Union, Represented by the State President, V.Mariappan No.4/520-1, Ezhilagam Ganga Nagar, parasuramanpatti, Madurai – 625 007

¶8

:Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

1.The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶11

Represented by its Principal Secretary,

¶12

Co operation Food and Consumer Protection Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶13

2.The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶14

Represented by its Principal Secretary,

¶15

Finance Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶16

3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶17

4.The General Manager (Administration),

¶18

Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. : Respondents

¶19

Prayer : Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to revise the pay scale of the members of the petitioner's registered Trade Union in the cadres of Helper, Assistant Operator Grade-II, Assistant Store Keeper Grade-II, Mill Operator / Welder Cum Fitter / Electrician Grade-1 and Shift Engineer, by considering the representation, dated 22.04.2015, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶20

For Petitioner :M/S.S.Louis for Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents :Mr.R.Anandha Raj, GA (R1 and R2)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondents :Mr.Mayarajan

(R3 and R4)

O R D E R

The prayer in the Writ Petition is a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to revise the pay scale of the members of the petitioner's registered Trade Union, in the cadres of Helper, Assistant Operator Grade-II, Assistant Store Keeper GradeII, Mill Operator / Welder Cum Fitter / Electrician Grade-1 and Shift Engineer, by considering the representation, dated 22.04.2015.

¶26

By consent of both parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶27

3.The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if the representation of the petitioner is disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶28

4.In view of the limited scope of the prayer, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue involved, the 1^st respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 22.04.2015, if not already disposed of, and pass appropriate orders on the same, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. If on a specified date the petitioner does not appear for personal hearing, orders may be passed in accordance with law based on the available records, after recording the absence of the Party/Parties. The persons, who are likely to be affected are also to be heard before any final decision is to be taken.

¶29

5.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶32

/True copy/

¶33

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶34

1.The Principal Secretary,

¶35

State of Tamil Nadu

¶36

Co operation Food and Consumer Protection Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶37

2.The Principal Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

¶40

3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶41

4.The General Manager (Administration), Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶42

+1cc to Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Advocate in Sr NO.37001

¶43

+1cc to Mr.D.Mayarajan,Advocate in sr NO.36701

¶44

+1cc to Special Government Pleader in SR No.37101

¶45

W.P.(MD).No.11414 of 2015

¶46

017.07.2015

¶47

rg.27.07.2015 3p.8c.

¶48

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamilnadu Civil Supplies v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilnadu Civil Supplies v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mallika Vs the District Collector

S.Amuthavalli Vs the Director of Panchayats

Managing Trustee Cum Vs Manonmaniam Sundaranar

S. Vijayameena, Vs the Revenue Divisional

Keins College of Education Vs the National Council for

A.Pari Vs the Agricultural Production