Disposed

P.Subu Lakshmi v. the District Collector

Madras HC6 Jul 2015WP(MD)/11319/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to grant patta for specific properties. The court directed the Tahsildar to consider the representation on merits within two months after giving notice to interested parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's representation on merits with notice to interested parties within two months.

P.Subu Lakshmi Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :06.07.2015

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.11319 of 2015

P.Subu Lakshmi

... Petitioner

1.The District Collector, District Collector Campus,

¶11

Theni District, Theni.

¶12

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Collector Campus,

¶13

Theni District.

¶14

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶15

Revenue Divisional Office,

¶16

Theni District.

¶17

4.The Tahsildar,

¶18

O/o. The Tahsildar,

¶19

Bodi Taluk, Theni District. ... Respondents

¶20

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant patta for properties in S.No.80/2, in Ward No.10, Tagore Street, Silamarathupatti, Ammapatti Village, Bodi Nayakanoor Taluk, Theni District, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶21

For petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Govt.Advocate

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant patta for properties in S.No.80/2, in Ward No.10, Tagore Street, Silamarathupatti, Ammapatti Village, Bodi Nayakanoor Taluk, Theni District, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ submit that the above mentioned property, belongs to her, to which, there are no rival claims nor any suit is pending. Hence, the petitioner has sought for the relief stated supra.

¶25

¶26

The learned Govt.Advocate for the respondents would submit that, the representation of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.

¶27

In view of the specific submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, the fourth respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.06.2015, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the interested parties, if any, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

Assistant Registrar(RTI)

¶31

\True copy\

¶32

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶33

¶34

1.The District Collector, District Collector Campus,

¶35

Theni District, Theni.

¶36

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Collector Campus,

¶37

Theni District.

¶38

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶39

Revenue Divisional Office,

¶40

Theni District.

¶41

4.The Tahsildar,

¶42

O/o. The Tahsildar,

¶43

Bodi Taluk, Theni District.

¶44

+1cc to Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Advocate Sr.No.36730

¶45

+1cc to The Spl.Govt.Pleader Sr.No.36564

¶46

akm/15.07.15 /2p-7c/

¶47

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶48

W.P(MD).No.11319 of 2015 06.07.2015

P.Subu Lakshmi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Subu Lakshmi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.A. Vidhya Bhavan Higher Vs the District Collector

Navaneethakrishnan, Vs the Managing Director

S. Selvaraj, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M/S B.G. Naidu Sweets, Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Muthuraj Vs the Tahsildar

K. Jeyapaul, Vs the District Collector