Disposed

Dr. Prabhu Thangavel v. the Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC25 Jun 2015WP(MD)/10405/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking duplicate R.C. Books for deceased's vehicles was disposed of by directing the RT Officer to consider the petition upon fulfillment of required conditions, including obtaining no-objection from other legal heirs.

What did the court decide?

Reserve the petition for orders on hearing or direct the respondent to pass orders upon fulfillment of conditions.

Dr. Prabhu Thangavel Vs the Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 25/6/2015

¶3

C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶4

Writ Petition (MD) No.10405 of 2015

¶5

Dr.Prabhu Thangavel ... Petitioner Vs

¶6

The Regional Transport Officer, Office of Regional Transport Office, Trichy West, Piratiyur, Trichy – 9.

¶7

.... Respondents

¶8

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue duplicate R.C.Book of vehicles (Maruti AltoReg.No.TN-Reg.No.TN-45 AM -5488 and Maruti Swift Reg.No.TN-45-AM7304) in petitioner's favour, basing on the representation dated 16.06.2015.

¶9

This writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue duplicate R.C.Book of vehicles viz., Maruti Alto-Reg.No.TN-45-AM-5488 and Maruti Swift Reg.No.TN-45-AM-7304, in favour of the petitioner, based on his representation, dated 16.06.2015.

¶10

The case of the petitioner is that the vehicles viz.,Maruthi Alto, bearing Registration No. TN-45-AM-5488 and Maruti Swift, bearing Reg.No.TN-45-AM-7304, belonged to one Thangavel, father of the petitioner, who died on 26.01.2015, leaving behind four legal heirs, including the petitioner. The petitioner submitted that the original RC Book is missing and that the petitioner's father had already given a complaint, as early as in 2014 and the Sub Inspector of Police issued CSR No.173/2014 and inspite of search of the original R.C.Book of the vehicles, the same could not be traced.

¶11

3.That being the case, after the petitioner's father died on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 26.01.2015, the petitioner applied for duplicate R.C.Books for the two vehicles, mentioned supra, by enclosing the death certificate and the legal heirs certificate issued by the Revenue Divisional

¶12

¶13

Officer, Trichy West, Trichy District and made a representation for issuance of duplicate R.C.Books, for which, no response. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the aforesaid prayer that the respondents should issue duplicate R.C.Books to him, based on representation dated 16.06.2015. In this case, the petitioner has not made the other legal heirs as party. That apart, he has also not produced any documents to that effect that the other legal heirs have no objection for the petitioner to get the R.C.Books transferred in his name. The Status of the complaint given by the petitioner's father is also not known.

¶14

Mr.R.Anandha Raj, the learned Government Advocate submitted that, if the petitioner fulfils the conditions required for getting the duplicate R.C.Books of the vehicles in question, the case of the petitioner would be considered, within a time stipulated by this Court.

¶15

Taking note of the fact that the legal heirs have not been made as party to the proceedings; that the petitioner has not filed any affidavit in respect of other legal heirs, stating that they have no objection to get R.C.Book transferred in favour of the petitioner; and that the status of the complaint given by the petitioner's father is not known, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.06.2015 and pass necessary orders for issuance of duplicate certificate, in accordance with law, on the petitioner fulfilling the necessary conditions required by the respondents.

¶16

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶17

mpk. To

¶18

The Regional Transport Officer, Office of Regional Transport Office, Trichy West, Piratiyur, Trichy – 9.

¶19

1CC TO THE SPL GP SR: 34018

¶20

DM 10 JULY 2015 – 2P 3C

¶21

Writ Petition (MD) No.10405 of 2015 25/6/2015

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr. Prabhu Thangavel v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Prabhu Thangavel v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Thangaraj, Vs the Senior Regional Managaer

S. Ravichandran, Vs the Tamilnadu Water Supply

M.Ravindran Mariappan, Vs the Secretary to the Govt.

M.Mohandass Vs the Chief Engineer

Kottaimuthu, Vs the Commissioner

S. Sathish, Vs the Additional Chief