Dismissed

K.Jaisankar v. The Joint Registrar of

Madras HC6 Apr 2015WP/9886/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking compassionate appointment for his wife. The Court held that the petitioner failed to question his own removal or seek alternative employment, and thus had no legal basis to claim rights for his wife's appointment.

What did the court decide?

The Court refused to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's wife's application for compassionate appointment.

K.Jaisankar Vs The Joint Registrar of — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.04.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

¶5

W.P.No.9886 of 2015

¶6

K.Jaisankar ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Krishnagiri Region, Krishnagiri.

¶9

S-5922, Maharajakadai Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Maharajakadai Village and Post, Krishnagiri Taluk and District rep. by its President ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer : Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the applications of the petitioner dated 10.12.2014 and 23.03.2015 for the appointment of the wife of the petitioner by name Tmt.J.Eswari to any post in the second respondent Society or any other Co-operative Society under the compassionate ground.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundram Spl. Govt. Pleader (Co-op.) ORDER

¶12

With the consent of both sides, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

The petitioner was appointed as Fertilizer Salesman in 1989 in the second respondent Co-operative Bank, namely, Maharajakadai Primary Agricultural co-operative Bank. He worked for more than 19 years. Since he lost vision in both the eyes, he was referred to the Medical Board on 29.04.2010. Based on the report of the Medical Board dated 30.04.2010, he was declared medically unfit and thereafter, he was removed from service by the Special Officer by the order dated 10.07.2010.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

The petitioner has not chosen to question that order or to seek any alternative employment for him on one ground or the other. On the other hand, he filed this writ petition seeking for employment to his wife on compassionate grounds. The petitioner made a representation dated 10.02.2014 in this regard.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to show any legal rights based on which, the petitioner seeks employment to his wife. Hence, I am not inclined to give any direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner to give employment to his wife, as he did not make any request to give him any alternative employment.

¶17

Accordingly, this writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CO)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
gg
To
The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Krishnagiri Region,
Krishnagiri.
1 cc to Mr.L.P. Shanmugasundaram, Advocate Sr. 19053
1 cc to Mr.S. Doraisamy, Advocate, Sr. 18867
1 cc to Government Pleader, Sr. 19118

¶19

W.P.No.9886 of 2015 SK (CO) kk 15/4

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Jaisankar v. The Joint Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Jaisankar v. The Joint Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Thangasamy Raja, Vs Mr. Subramanian

K.Premalatha Vs G.Karunakaran

M. Kavitha, W/O. Marimuthu, Vs K. Marimuthu

R.Moorthirajan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Mr.M.Gandhi Vs The Secretary to Government

V.Selvalakshmi, Vs The State of Tamilnadu