Dismissed

C.M.Sivababu, President v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC7 Apr 2015WP/9878/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a Writ of Mandamus to initiate legal proceedings against the 11th respondent based on a representation dated 19.9.2014. The Court found no merit as the petition did not raise any public interest issue and dismissed the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ of Mandamus directed against the 11th respondent was dismissed.

C.M.Sivababu, President Vs The State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated: 07.04.2015

¶3

Coram:

¶4

The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and

¶5

The Honourable Mr. Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

Writ Petition No. 9878 of 2015

¶7

C.M. Sivababu
President, Tamil Desiya Makkal Katchi
180/32, Iyyakannu Mudaliar Street
Tiruvannamalai - 606 601. .. Petitioner
vs.
1. The State of Tamilnadu
Rep. by its Secretary
Home Department
Fort St. George, Chennai.
2. The Secretary to State of Tamilnadu
Revenue Department
Fort St. George, Chennai.
3. The Secretary to State of Tamilnadu
Education Department
Fort St. George, Chennai.
4. The District Collector
Vengikkal , Collector's Office
Tiruvannamalai.
5. The District Superintendent of Police
Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai.
6. The Commissioner
Department of Hindu Religious and Charitable
Endowments, Nungambakkam High Road
Chennai-600034.
7. The Chief Educational Officer
Chief Educational Office
Tiruvannamalai.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

The District Registrar
The Registrar of Societies
Gandhi Nagar, Tiruvannamalai.
9. The Inspector of Police
Kadaladi Police Station
Tiruvannamalai District.
10. The Head Master
Arattavadi Panchayat Union Middle School
Arattavadi Village, Chengam Taluk
Tiruvannamalai District.
11. Rajavel .. Respondents
---
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent
authorities to initiate appropriate legal proceedings against the 11 th
respondent in view of the petitioner's representation dated 19.9.2014.
---
For Petitioner : Mr. J. Ashok
For Respondents : Mr. S.T.S. Murthi
Govt. Pleader for R1 to R9.
---
O R D E R
(Made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice)
We find no merit in this writ petition which does not in any
manner raise any public interest issue.
2. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. No costs.
ATR

¶10

-s/dAssistant Registrar(CO) True Copy

¶11

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Cop	ies to;
1.	The Secretary State of Tamilnadu Home Department Fort St. George, Chennai.
2.	The Secretary to State of Tamilnadu Revenue Department Fort St. George, Chennai.
3.	The Secretary to State of Tamilnadu Education Department
	Fort St. George, Chennai.
4.	The District Collector Vengikkal , Collector's Office Tiruvannamalai.
5.	The District Superintendent of Police Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai.
6.	The Commissioner Department of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai-600034.
7. 8.	The Chief Educational Officer Chief Educational Office Tiruvannamalai. The District Registrar The Registrar of Societies Gandhi Nagar, Tiruvannamalai.
9.	The Inspector of Police Kadaladi Police Station Tiruvannamalai District.
+ 1 + 1	cc to M/s.J.Ashok, Advocate SR 19084 cc to the Government pleader, High Court, Madras SR 19112
ala prk	(co) 16/4 W.P. No. 9878 of 2015

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.M.Sivababu, President v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.M.Sivababu, President v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Gobika, 300/183 II Floor, Vs the Commissioner of Police

Dr.G.R.Ragunathan Vs the Director of Town & Country

S.Jayachandran, S/O.S.M. Vs the Principal Secretary to

A.Raja Vs The Collector

V.Chitrarasu Vs The District Collector

A.Rangasamy Vs The District Collector