M.Kumaravel v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ for removal of machinery and transformer from his land. Upon counsel's request to withdraw the petition, the court dismissed the writ as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with directions to close the connected matter; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.08.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. KIRUBAKARAN
W.P. No. 9291 of 2015
&
M.P. No. 1 of of 2015
M. Kumaravel ..Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002.
2. The Assistant Divisional Engineer,
Zone-64,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Kolathur, Chennai – 600 099.
3. The Assistant Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Zone – 64, Kolathur,
Chennai – 600 099. ..Respondents
Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the present installation of the heavy machineries, transformer and etc., on the east side of the petitioner's house and to put up on the vacant land available on the same street.
For Petitioner :: Mr.S. Santhosh Kumar
For Respondents :: Mr.P.R. Dhilipkumar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Kumaravel
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Zone-64, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer, Zone – 64, Kolathur, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court