M.Paneerselvam v. the State of Tamilnadu
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.06.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
Writ Petition No.9079 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
M.Paneerselvam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Rural Development and Panchayat
Raj Department, Secretariat,
Chennai -9.
2.The Director of Rural Development,
Chennai -15.
3.The District Collector,
Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
4.The Panchayat Union Commissioner,
Pabanasam Panchayat Union,
Thanjavur District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected in Na.Ka.No.7479/2010/K.5 dated 19.04.2011 passed by the third respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment as Basic Service Personnel in any one of the vacancies in pursuant to the Hon'ble High Court order dated 28.08.2009 in W.P.No.8496 of 2007 and W.P.Nos.8498 to 8503 of 2007 and appoint the petitioner in any one of the vacancies based on the representations of the petitioner dated 29.11.2010 and 17.02.2011. Prayer amended as per order dt.4.8.11 in MP.No.2/11 in WP.9079/11.
For Respondents : Ms.M.E.Raniselvam Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.R.Ravichandran for R4
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Paneerselvam
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Director of Rural Development
- respondent
District Collector, Thanjavur
- respondent
Panchayat Union Commissioner, Pabanasam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court