K.Meenakshisundaram v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a writ petition seeking retirement benefits as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.06.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. HARIPARANTHAMAN
W.P.No.8575 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
K.Meenakshisundaram .. Petitioner Vs. The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to disburse the petitioner's retirement benefits like Provident Fund, Special Provident Fund, Gratuity, Death Cum Retirement Gratuity Benefits (DCRGB) and Leave Salary. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam, Additional Government Pleader ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar Jrl
To
The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
1 cc to Mr. C.Prakasam, Advocate Sr.No.30324 ggk(co) pmk.31.7.2015
W.P.No.8575 of 2015
K. Meenakshisundaram
The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai
D. Hariparantanaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court