Dismissed

R.Nagaraj, v. Union of India

Madras HC3 Jul 2015WP/8312/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged the service of the Managing Director and Executive Director of REPCO Bank beyond 60 years of age. The court accepted that their retirement age is 62 years, holding no legal bar on their continued service, and dismissed the writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were dismissed as there is no legal bar on continuing the service of the respondents up to 62 years of age.

R.Nagaraj, Vs Union of India — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.07.2015

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

¶6

W.P.Nos.8312 and 17765 of 2015

¶7

R.Nagaraj

¶8

.. Petitioner in W.P.No.8312/2015

¶9

B.Murugan

¶10

.. Petitioner in W.P.No.17765/201

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.Union of India,

¶13

Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi-1.

¶14

2.The Joint Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, (Department of Personnel and Training), New Delhi-1.

¶15

3.The Chairman (REPCO Bank) cum the Secretary, Public and Rehabilitation Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶16

4.The Managing Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶17

5.The Executive Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶18

¶19

6.Mr.R.Varadharajan,

¶20

The Managing Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶21

7.Mr.K.Rajendran,

¶22

The Executive Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶23

.. Respondents in W.P.No.8312/2015

¶24

1.Union of India,

¶25

Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs,Government of India, New Delhi.

¶26

2.The Central Registrar of Co-operative Societies cum Joint Secretary to Government, Department of Agriculture & Co-Operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

¶27

3.The Board of Directors, REPCO Bank, Rep. By its Chairman-cum-Secretary to Government, Public and Rehabilitation Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 009.

¶28

4.The Managing Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶29

5.The Executive Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶30

6.Mr.R.Varadharajan,

¶31

The Managing Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶32

¶33

7.Mr.K.Rajendran, The Executive Director, REPCO Bank, REPCO Tower, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

¶34

.. Respondents in W.P.No.17765/2015

¶35

Writ Petition in W.P.No.8312 of 2015 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing respondents 1 to 3 from allowing the 4^th and 5^th respondents to continue in service after completion of 60 years of age, particularly, directing the 3^rd respondent to implement the proceedings of the 2^nd respondent in Office Memorandum No.25012/8/98-Estt.(A) Dated 30.05.1998, imposing a complete ban on extension in service beyond 60 years towards the post of the 4^th and 5^th respondents.

¶36

Writ Petition in W.P.No.17765 of 2015 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration declaring respondents 6 and 7 functioning in the post of respondents 4 and 5 beyond the age of 60 years is null and void and violation of bye laws and service regulations of the 3^rd respondent bank and also directing respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action to terminate respondents 6 and 7 from the post of Managing Director and Executive Director respectively in the 3^rd respondent bank within the time prescribed by this Court.

¶37

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sellapandian in W.P.8312/2015

¶38

For Petitioner : Mr.J.James in W.P.17765/2015

¶39

¶40

For Respondents : Mr.K.T.Raghavan, SCGSC., for R1& R2 in W.P.8312/2015

¶41

Mr.A.Murughan, CGC., for R1 & R2 in

¶42

W.P.17765/2015

¶43

Mr.G.Rajagopal,

¶44

Addl. Solicitor General, Assisted by Mr.A.Ilangovan for R3 in both WPs.

¶45

Mrs.A.V.Bharathi for R4 to R7 in both WPs.

¶46

COMMON ORDER

¶47

These writ petitions are filed seeking to forbear Mr.K.Rajendran,

¶48

the seventh respondent in both the writ petitions, from functioning as Executive Director and Mr.R.Varadharajan, the sixth respondent in

¶49

both the writ petitions, from functioning as Managing Director of REPCO Bank beyond 60 years of age.

¶50

2. Mr.G.Rajagopal, learned Additional Solicitor General,

¶51

appearing for the REPCO Bank, submitted that the age of retirement for Executive Director and Managing Director is 62 years. He further submitted that the Executive Director has already retired from service on reaching the age of superannuation.

¶52

In view of the statement made by the learned Additional

¶53

¶54

Solicitor General appearing for the REPCO Bank that the age of retirement for Executive Director and Managing Director is 62 years, there is no legal bar in continuing the service upto 62 years.

¶55

Accordingly, these writ petitions fail and the same are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

03.07.2015

Index:No raa

1.The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi-1.

¶60

2.The Joint Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, (Department of Personnel and Training), New Delhi-1.

¶61

3.The Chairman (REPCO Bank) cum the Secretary, Public and Rehabilitation Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶62

4.The Central Registrar of Co-operative Societies cum Joint Secretary to Government, Department of Agriculture & Co-Operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

¶63

¶64

D.HARIPARANTHAMAN,J.

¶65

raa

¶66

5.The Board of Directors, REPCO Bank, Rep. By its Chairman-cum-Secretary to Government, Public and Rehabilitation Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600 009.

¶67

¶68

W.P.Nos.8312 & 17765 2015

¶69

03.07.2015

R.Nagaraj, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Nagaraj, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.M.Viyagulamary Vs a.v.D.Seetharaman

E.Chinnadurai, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.C.Ushashree Vs The State of Tamilnadu

G. Rajendran Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

T.L.Nageswara Rao Vs The District Collector

Dr.Olga George, M.D. (Hom) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu