Dr.L.Anitha v. The Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order closing a writ petition seeking quashing of university HR proceedings; respondent counsel asserted relief; no substantive decision recorded.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed based on respondent counsel's statement without specific relief granted by the court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. HARIPARANTHAMAN
Dr.L.Anitha .. Petitioner
The Registrar, Karunya University, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Karunya Nagar, Coimbatore - 641 114. .. Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the proceedings dated 06.02.2015 and bearing No.KU/REG/HR-3/1697/15 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction.
The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the proceedings of the respondent dated 06.02.2015 bearing No.KU/REG/HR-3/1697/15.
- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
- Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that appropriate order relieving the petitioner would be passed taking into account the E-mail dated 13.11.2014 sent by the petitioner.
- The said statement of the learned counsel for the respondent is recorded and the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. L. Anitha
- respondent
The Registrar, Karunya University
Coram
D. Hariparamathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court