Disposed

M.Hemavathi v. The Commissioner

Madras HC18 Feb 2015WP/572/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directs the Zonal Officer of the Corporation of Chennai to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 28.09.2014 on merits, taking into account her earlier engagement, within two months. The petition is disposed of with this direction.

What did the court decide?

The second respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 28.09.2014 on merits within two months.

M.Hemavathi Vs The Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.02.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN

¶5

Writ Petition No.572 of 2015

¶6

1 M.Hemavathi .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs
1 The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
Rippon Building
Chennai 3
2 The Zonal Officer
Zone 7, Ambattur
Corporation of Chennai
Chennai 53 .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
for the issuance of writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent
to dispose of the petitioner;s representation dated 8.9.2014.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi For Respondents : Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran O R D E R

¶9

The petitioner earlier worked as NMR worker in Ambattur Municipality. The Municipality was merged with Corporation. The petitioner was not engaged after the merger of the local body. The petitioner having found that there are vacancies in the post of NMR workers, submitted a representation on 8.09.2014, requesting the second respondent to engage her continuously taking into account her earlier engagement. The present request is to direct the second respondent to consider the said representation on merits.

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for Chennai Corporation.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

The second respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 28.09.2014 on merits and as per law, taking into account the earlier engagement of the petitioner. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶13

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

¶14

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CO)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
ajr
To
1 The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
Rippon Building
Chennai 3
2 The Zonal Officer
Zone 7, Ambattur
Corporation of Chennai
Chennai 53
1 cc to M/s.S. Ilamvaludhi, Advocate, Sr. 9365
W.P.No.572 of 2015
CA (CO)
kk 10/3

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Hemavathi v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Hemavathi v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Ramasamy Vs The Director of Animal

D.Roselin Joyce, Vs Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies

S.Alexraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu

S.Johnbosco Vs the Chief Engineer

R.Pravin Raj, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Tmt.R.Prasannadevi, Vs The Director of School