Remanded

K.Saravanan, S/o.Kaveri v. The District Manager

Madras HC23 Feb 2015WP/4039/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner was suspended pending disciplinary proceedings. The court directed the respondents to conclude the proceedings within six months and directed payment of subsistence allowance during that period. The petition is disposed of with no order for reinstatement or monetary benefits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conclude disciplinary proceedings within six months and pay subsistence allowance; case disposed without granting reinstatement or monetary benefits.

K.Saravanan, S/o.Kaveri Vs The District Manager — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated :23.02.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. SASIDHARAN

¶5

Writ Petition No.4039 of 2015

¶6

¶7

M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶8

K.Saravanan ...Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

The District Manager
M/s.TASMAC Limited
Dharmapuri District

¶11

The District Manager M/s.TASMAC Limited Krishnagiri ... Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to second respondent's order made in proceedings Na.Ka.No.31/2015/CV-1 dated 07.02.2015, to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner and extend all benefits both service and monetary.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.L.Chandrakumar

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.S.Muthuraj

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The petitioner challenges the order dated 07.02.2015 whereby and where under he was placed under suspension pending initiation of disciplinary proceedings.

¶17

The learned standing counsel appearing for Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, on instructions, submitted that the proceedings would be completed within six months. The said submission is recorded.

¶18

The first respondent is directed to conclude the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner as early as possible, and in any case within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to point out that the

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

petitioner should be paid subsistence allowance during the currency of the Disciplinary Proceedings.

¶21

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar Dated:9.3.15

¶23

True Copy

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The District Manager
M/s.TASMAC Limited
Dharmapuri District
2. The District Manager
M/s.TASMAC Limited
Krishnagiri
+1 cc to Mr.L.Chandrakumar, Advocate,SR.9946.
rv(co)
krd 12/3
W.P.No.4039 of 2015 &
M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Saravanan, S/o.Kaveri v. The District Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Saravanan, S/o.Kaveri v. The District Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Thirunavukkarasu, Vs State of Tamilnadu

B.Ramesh, Vs The Director of Agriculture

C.Devadoss, Vs the Additional Registrar

S.Seetharaman Vs the Assistant Treasury Officer

P.Sakthivel, Vs the Principal Secretary to

R.Kumar, Vs the Managing Director