Allowed

M.Rajini v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC14 Dec 2015WP/39137/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In consolidated writ petitions, the High Court directed respective Regional Transport Officers to receive pending autorickshaw permit applications, consider them on merits, and pass orders within four weeks without examining the merits of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Directed respective Regional Transport Officers to receive applications, consider them on merits, and pass orders within four weeks.

M.Rajini Vs The Transport Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 14.12.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.39137 to 39148 of 2015

¶6

M. Rajini ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39137/15 P. Anandan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39138/15 R. Vasanth Kumar ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39139/15 S. Udayakumar ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39140/15 S. Amudha ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39141/15 P. Panchavaram ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39142/15 S. Sathish ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39143/15 K. Siva ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39144/15 S. Malaivasan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39145/15 M. Murugan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39146/15 R. Jayanthi ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39147/15 S. Lalitha ..Petitioner in W.P.No.39148/15

¶7

Vs The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai 5 ..1st Respondent in all the WP's The Regional Transport Officer Poonamallee .. 2nd Respondent in WP.NO.39137/15, 39138/15, 39139/15 The Regional Transport Officer, Ambathur ..Respondent in WP.No.39140/15 The Regional Transport Oficer, Chennai (West) Chennai. ..Respondent in WP.NO.39141/15 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (South), Chennai. ..Respondent in WP.NO.39142/15 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North), Chennai. ..Respondent in WP.NO.39143/15, 39145/15

¶8

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (East), Chennai. ..Respondent in WP.NO.39144/15

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

The Regional Transport Officer, Sholinganellur.

¶11

..Respondent in WP.NO.39146/15, 39147/15

¶12

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North East), Chennai.

¶13

..Respondent in WP.NO.39148/15

¶14

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to receive the application of the Petitioner dated 28.9.2015 in Form CCPA with the prescribed Fee for grant of Autorickshaw Permit and to consider the same.

¶15

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking the common relief of issuing a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Regional Transport Authority concerned to receive the respective application of the petitioners in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respective respondents.

¶17

Without going into the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respective concerned Regional Transport Officer to receive the respective applications of the petitioners, consider the same and pass appropriate orders for grant of autorickshaw permit, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

No costs.

¶19

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

¶22

The Transport Commissioner
State Transport Authority, Chepauk Chennai 5
2. The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee
3. The Regional Transport Officer, Ambathur
4. The Regional Transport Oficer,
Chennai (West) Chennai.
5. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (South), Chennai.
6. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (North), Chennai.
7. The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (East), Chennai.
8. The Regional Transport Officer,
Sholinganallur.
9.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai (North East), Chennai.
+ 12 ccs to M/s. S. Govindaraman, Advocate Sr.67006
+ 1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.67194
W.P.Nos.39137 to 39148 of 2015
AD(CO)
EU 7.1.16

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Rajini v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Rajini v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Rajendaran, Vs The Managing Director

M/s. Sun Direct Tv Pvt. Ltd, Vs The Commissioner of

Mrs.Lyme George, Vs The General Manager

Shapoorji Pallonji & Co.Ltd., Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

Sulochana Bhimaraja Vs The commissioner of Income

Stream Line Forwarders Vs The Commissioner of Customs