Allowed

M/s. Eversendai Constructions v. The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Madras HC8 Dec 2015WP/38612/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted a writ of mandamus directing the Assistant Commissioner (CT) to pass orders on a pending rectification petition filed by a registered dealer regarding inter-purchase turnover, emphasizing the necessity of a personal hearing and opportunity within six weeks to conclude the exercise.

What did the court decide?

The respondent directed to pass appropriate orders on the rectification petition under Section 84 after affording due opportunity within six weeks from receipt of this order.

M/s. Eversendai Constructions Vs The Assistant… — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.12.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.No.38612 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶6

M/s. Eversendai Constructions Private Limited Rep. by K.Saravanan Director

¶7

Plot No.1&2 The Lords Block 1 5th Flr Jawaharlal Nehru Salai Ekkattuthangal Guindy Chennai-32. [ Petitioner ] Vs

¶8

The Assistant Commissioner(CT) Nanganallur Assessment Circle Chennai-91.

¶9

[ Respondent]

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pass orders on the petition for rectification / reopening of assessment dated 30.10.15 after grant of personal hearing and opportunity.

¶11

For petitioner : Mr.C.Venkataraman For respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, AGP(T)

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), who took notice for the respondent and with their consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal.

¶14

The writ petition is filed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pass orders on the petition for rectification / reopening of assessment dated 30.10.15, after grant of personal hearing and opportunity.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

The petitioners are registered dealers and manufacturers of fabricated structural steel and also undertake works contract and erection work. The petitioners have been assessed under the CST Act for the years 2009-10 to 2012-13. As per the assessment, they are not in arrears of tax for the year 2009-10, however, for the years 2010-11 to 2012-13, the respondent has raised demands. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 30.10.2015 to the respondent requesting him to reopen the assessment and pass revised orders of demand for all the years for the reasons given in the said petition. Till date no orders has been passed on the same. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is the specific case of the petitioner that taxes paid by them for the respective assessment years had not been taken into consideration while passing orders as well as raising demands. Hence, pointing out certain errors apparent on the face of the record viz., that the turnover of Rs.1,93,26,324/- does not form part of the taxable turnover as the said turnover represents inter purchase of goods, a rectification petition under Section 84 of the Act came to be filed and the same is pending consideration. Hence, the learned counsel seeks indulgence of this Court for a direction to consider petition filed under Section 84 of the Act and pass appropriate orders on merits, for which, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the said petition will be considered on merits within the time limit fixed by this Court.

¶18

In view of the above, the respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the petition filed under Section 84 of the Act, after affording due opportunity to the petitioner. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

-s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

¶24

The Assistant Commissioner(CT) Nanganallur Assessment Circle Chennai-91.

¶25

+1 cc to Mr.C.Venkataraman, Advocate vide sr.66130 +1 cc to Special Government Pleader(Taxes) sr.65851

¶26

W.P.No.38612 of 2015

¶27

aa18/12/2015

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s. Eversendai Constructions v. The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Eversendai Constructions v. The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.K.Rathinavel Mudaliar and Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Tvl.Sri Ram Trading Company, Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Tvl Seven Hills Medtech Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

B.Pondidurai, Vs the District Collector

M/s.Prime Hitech Engineering Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Infinite Leathers (P) Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)