Dismissed

B.Pushparaj, v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC1 Dec 2015WP/38257/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismissed multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court directed the Regional Transport Officer to receive the petitioners' applications for autorickshaw permits, consider them on merits, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directive to the Regional Transport Officer to receive applications for autorickshaw permits, consider them on merits, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

B.Pushparaj, Vs The Transport Commissioner — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 01.12.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.38257 to 38269 of 2015

¶6

B.Pushparaj ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38257/15 P.Ranjith kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38258/15 R.Rajesh ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38259/15 V.Suresh ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38260/15 E.Sumayua Frose ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38261/15 E.Ponni ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38262/15 M.Komathi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38263/15 A.Arumugam ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38264/15 A.Rekha ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38265/15 S.Santhi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38266/15 K.Prashanth ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38267/15 M.Krishnan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38268/15 M.Sehthil Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.38269/15 Vs 1 The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai-600 005. 2 The Regional Transport Officer Chennai (North East) Chennai. ...Respondents in all WPs

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 01.11.2015 in Form CCPA with the prescribed fee for grant of Authorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For petitioners Mr.S.Arunkumar in all WPs

¶10

For respondents Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, GA in all WPs

¶11

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking the common relief of issuing a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the 2nd respondent Regional Transport Authority concerned to receive the respective application of the petitioners dated 1/11/2015 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶12

Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respective respondents.

¶13

Without going into the merits of the matters, these

¶14

writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respective concerned Regional Transport Officer to receive the respective applications of the petitioners, consider the same and pass appropriate orders for grant of autorickshaw permit, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶15

No costs.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶18

True Copy

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

To:

¶22

The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

¶23

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai North East, Chennai

¶24

+13cc to M/S.S.Arun Kumar, Advocate Sr.65525,65526,65527,65528,65529,65530,65531,65532,65533,65534,6 5536,65537,65539

¶25

W.P.Nos.38257 to 38269 of 2015

¶26

vd[co] srg 09/12/2015

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Pushparaj, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Pushparaj, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. a.v.Arockiamary, Vs The Managing Director

Vignesh Driving School Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Balaji Driving School Vs The Principal Secretary

M/s.Src Projects (P) Ltd., Vs The Assistant Commissioner

M/s.Chakrapani Vyapar Private Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax

R.Malar Vs The Transport Commissioner