The petitioner sought to withdraw the long-pending writ petition regarding unpaid bills for road improvements. The High Court permitted the withdrawal with liberty to approach other forums, dismissing the petition with no costs.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to work out the remedy in the manner known to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.10.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
W.P.No.35022 of 2003
M/s.S.Arumairaj a partnership Company Rep.by its partner L.Subramaniam Apartment 11, First Floor, Mookambika Complex, No.4, Lady Desika Road, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004 ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Highways & Rural Works, Chennai Circle, Chennai – 600 025. 2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways), Chengalpattu Division, Chengalpattu. 3.S.Arumairaj ... Respondents (R3 impleaded as per order dated 13.10.2011 in WPMP.No.23763 of 2004 in W.P.No.35022 of 2003)
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent above named pursuant to his letter No.48/99/A.2 dated 19.05.2003, quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent herein to forthwith pay the petitioner the amount which are due and payable to him in the final bill in respect of the work improvements to radial roads around Chennai City – Package (ix) forthwith together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 29.10.2001.
For Petitioner : Mr.AL.Gandhimathi For Respondents : Mr.S.K.Chandrakumar (R3) Mr.R.A.S.Senthil Vel, Additional Government Pleader (R1 & R2)
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty and has submitted a letter to the Registry dated 01.10.2015 and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. No costs.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
va
To
1.The Superintending Engineer,
Highways & Rural Works,
Chennai Circle, Chennai – 600 025.
2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways),
Chengalpattu Division,
Chengalpattu.
+1 cc to M/S.AL.Ganthimathi Advocate sr.53981
+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr.54084
W.P.No.35022 of 2003
ts(co) aa13/10/2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. S. Arumairaj (Rep. by L. Subramaniam)
The Superintending Engineer, Highways & Rural Works, Chennai Circle
The Divisional Engineer (Highways), Chengalpattu Division
S. Arumairaj
M.M. Sundresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
