5.At the outset, this Court relevantly points out that the 6th Respondent/Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai in its Proceedings Na.Ka.No.G1/15709/2013 dated 05.01.2015 addressed to the Zonal Officer, Zone – 4, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai – 21, had, inter alia, stated that the forms of 51 eligible persons in regard to the alternate accommodation was scrutinised in respect of (i) name of encroachers, (ii) the address in Form 2; (iii) the address in family card; (iv) the voters list address and the 51 encroachers in the Tondiarpet Scheme Road in V.O.C. Nagar, had constructed huts by encroaching the same and are living. Further, 30 encroachers at V.O.C. Nagar Scheme Place had obtained allotments at the already constructed multi-storied residential buildings and some of them, through legal heirs and in other respects, are in enjoyment of the same. Therefore, out of 51 persons, who had encroached by putting up huts at Tondiarpet Scheme Road at V.O.C. Nagar, except 30 persons, who were provided with the accommodation and in respect of remaining persons, if necessary Government Documents, to establish that they are residing in the said place, are obtained and sent to its Board Office, then, the Board would take further action in regard to the residential allotment/accommodation to them.
