Disposed

R.Kumar v. The Secretary to the

Madras HC15 Dec 2015WP/33078/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition for issuance of patta, the Court held that entitlement is a matter for adjudication by the appropriate authority. Respondents were directed to dispose of pending representations within eight weeks, and petitioners were directed to submit a further representation enclosing the order copy.

What did the court decide?

Directions to dispose pending representations within eight weeks and petitioners to file further representation within two weeks.

R.Kumar Vs The Secretary to the — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 15.12.2015

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.No.33078 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

¶6

1 R.Kumar
2 M.Purusothamman
3 M.Prakash
4 M.Gowrish
5 M.Sathiya Narayanan
6 K.Parvathi
7 K.Rani
8 N.Jeeva
9 M.Uma
10 G.Gunalan ... Petitioners
Vs.
1 The Secretary to the
Government Revenue Department Secretariat
Chennai.
2 The District Collector
Kanchipuram District Kanchipuram.
3 The Revenue Divisional Officer
Kanchipuram Division Kanchipuram.
4 The Tahsildar
Saidapet / Solinganallur Division
Saidapet / Solinganallur Kanchipuram District

¶7

.... Respondents

¶8

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to assign the patta in the petitioner name in respect of the property under their occupation/ enjoyment of lands No.139 in Survey No.534 Perumbakkam Village, Sholinganallur, Saidapet Taluk, Kancheepuram District and directing the respondents not to disturb their possession and enjoyment of the property.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr. S.N.Kirubanandam For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.Pattabiraman

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioners have come forward with this writ petition seeking for the issuance of patta based upon the possession and proceedings of the Sub-Collector dated 20.06.1984 given in favour of persons, who are said to be similarly placed like the petitioners.

¶13

The entitlement of the petitioners for issuance of patta cannot be decided by this Court as it is a matter for adjudication by appropriate authority. However, it is suffice to take into consideration the pendency of the representations said to have been given in September 2012.

¶14

Hence, the above said representations are directed to be disposed of by respondent No.4 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by taking into consideration of the relevant materials including the proceedings of Sub-Collector dated 20.06.1984. The petitioners are also directed to give one more representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, enclosing the copy of the order passed in this writ petition.

¶15

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶16

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To

¶17

1 The Secretary to the Government Revenue Department Secretariat Chennai. 2 The District Collector Kanchipuram District Kanchipuram. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Kanchipuram Division Kanchipuram.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

4 The Tahsildar Saidapet / Solinganallur Division Saidapet / Solinganallur Kanchipuram District.

¶20

+1cc to Mr.S.N.Kirubanandam, Advocate sr.67782

¶21

+1cc to The Government Pleader Sr.67586

¶22

W.P.No.33078 of 2014
ug[co]
srg 18/12/2015

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Kumar v. The Secretary to the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Kumar v. The Secretary to the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alen Anto, Vs Anna University

K.Palanivel Vs District Collector

A.Marimuthu Vs Tamilnadu Teachers Education

M.L.Padmanabhan Vs the Commissioner

S.Sekar Vs the District Registrar

Raji Vs the Thasildhar