Disposed

G.Deivamalai v. The District Collector

Madras HC17 Mar 2015WP/31959/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the Block Development Officer to transfer the petitioner to Dhadapuram Village Panchayat as Panchayat Secretary, withdraw the charge memo, and join the new posting within three days. The writ petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of petitioner to Dhadapuram Village Panchayat as Panchayat Secretary; withdrawal of charge memo; joining new placement within three days.

G.Deivamalai Vs The District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 17.03.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN

¶5

Writ Petition No.31959 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014

¶6

G.Deivamalai .. Petitioner
vs.
1. The District Collector
Villupuram District
Villupuram.
2. The Block Development Officer
Olakkur Block
Villupuram District.
3. The President
Saram Panchayat
Saram Village
Tindivanam Taluk
Villupuram District.
4. The President
Panchalam Panchayat
Panchalam, Tindivanam
Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Respondents

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide Na.Ka.No.A2/243/2014 dated 27.10.2014 and to quash the same.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkadeshan

¶9

For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Ramesh

¶10

Additional Government Pleader for R1

¶11

Mr.S.V.Durai Solaimalai for R2 Mr.S.Seenivasan for R3 R4- Served - No appearance

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 27.10.2014 transferring the petitioner from the present location.

¶15

This Court taking into account the submission made by the petitioner that initially he was transferred to Panchalam and thereafter to Kadavambakkam, directed the Block Development Officer to appear in person today.

¶16

Thiru.N.Arumugam, Block Development Officer, Olakkur Panchayat is present in Court today. According to the Block Development Officer, there is a vacancy in the post of Panchayat Secretary at Dhadapuram Village Panchayat and the petitioner would be accommodate there. The petitioner, who is present in Court today, is also agreeable for the said course. The Block Development Officer has made it clear that the charge memo issued to the petitioner would be withdrawn.

¶17

In view of the affidavit filed by the Block Development Officer dated 17.03.2015, he is directed to pass consequential order transferring the petitioner to Dhadapuram Village Panchayat as Panchayat Secretary. He should also pass appropriate orders to withdraw the charge memo issued to the petitioner.

¶18

The petitioner is directed to join the transferred place within a period of three days from the date of receipt of transfer order.

¶19

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶20

Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS II )

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

vj2

The District Collector Villupuram District Villupuram.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

The Block Development Officer
Olakkur Block
Villupuram District.
3. The President
Saram Panchayat
Saram Village
Tindivanam Taluk
Villupuram District.
4. The President
Panchalam Panchayat
Panchalam, Tindivanam
Taluk, Villupuram District.
1 cc to Mr.S. Seenuvasan, Advocate, sr. 15259
1 cc to Mr.M.M.Venkdeshan, Advocate, sr. 14951
1 cc to Government Pleader,Sr. 15171
W.P.No.31959 of 2014
AG (CO)
kk 20/3

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Deivamalai v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Deivamalai v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Goodwin India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pa.Basheera

A.P.Rajasekaran, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Tmt.Saroja Vs Charles

C.Rajkumar Vs Chandrasekar

High Court Vs the Commissioner

A.Sakthivel Vs Deputy Inspector of Police