This Court disposed of a Writ Petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the Tahsildhar to consider a representation. Directing the writ was deemed inappropriate as an appeal challenging the relevant order was pending before the District Revenue Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 17.08.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
W.P.No.31632 of 2014
1.C.Muthusamy
2.Aruchamy
3.Kuppusamy ... Petitioners
– Vs -
1.The District Collector,
Coimbatore District,
Coimbatore-641001.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Coimbatore,
Coimbatore District.
3.The Sub Collector,
Pollachi,
Coimbatore District.
4.The Tahsildhar,
Tahsildhar Office,
Kinathukadavu,
Coimbatore District.
5.The Tahsildhar,
Tahsildar office,
Pollachi,
Coimbatore District.
6.Jaganathan
7.Ragava Balaji ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 5th Respondent to consider the representation dated 10.112014 sent by the petitioners and direct the 5th respondent to not to change the entries in the revenue records at instance of the respondents 6 & 7 within the time fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.Ravindran
for Mr.C.Veeraraghavan
For Respondents : Mr.S.Diwakar (R1 to R5) Additional Government Pleader Mr.L.Chandrakumar (R6 and R7)
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 6 and 7.
With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
arr
/true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1.The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore-641001.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Coimbatore,
Coimbatore District.
3.The Sub Collector,
Pollachi,
Coimbatore District.
4.The Tahsildhar,
Tahsildhar Office,
Kinathukadavu,
Coimbatore District.
5.The Tahsildhar,
Tahsildar office,
Pollachi,
Coimbatore District.
+1 cc to Mr.C.Veeraraghavan, Advocate, sr.43132
+1 cc to Mr.N.Chinnaraj, Advocate, sr.43297
+1 cc to Govt.Pleader, sr.43475
W.P.No.31632 of 2014
ksj(co)
kra(3/9)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction to the fifth respondent to consider a representation can be issued when an appeal challenging the same is pending before the second respondent.
C. Muthusamy and others
The District Collector, Coimbatore
The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore
The Sub Collector, Pollachi
The Tahsildhar, Kinathukadavu
The Tahsildhar, Pollachi and others
M.M. Sundresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
