Three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to consider representations for promotion of petitioners as Junior Engineer Electrical Grade II. The court disposed of the petitions relying on the principles laid down in a recent bench order dated 22.6.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.07.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
W.P.Nos.31029 to 31031 of 2012
K.Murali Rao ... Petitioner in
W.P.No.31029/12
M.Balamurali ... Petitioner in
W.P.No.31030/12
G.Sathyamoorthy ... Petitioner in
W.P.No.31031/12
vs.
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution
Corporation Ltd.,
No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-1
2.The Chief Engineer(Personnel),
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution
Corporation Ltd.,
No.144, Anna Salai,
Chennai-600 002 ...R1 and R2 in All WPs
3.The Superintending Engineer,
Krishnagiri Electricity Distribution Circle,
TANGEDCO Ltd.,
Krishnagiri District ... 3rd respondent in
W.P.No.31029/12
4.The Superintending Engineer,
Dharmapuri Electricity Distribution Circle,
TANGEDCO Ltd.,
Dharmapuri District ... 3rd respondent in
W.P.No.31030/12
5.The Superintending Engineer,
Tirupattur Electricity Distribution Circle,
TANGEDCO Ltd.,
Tirupattur ... 3rd respondent in
W.P.No.31031/12
Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioners dated 03.11.2012, 15.11.2012 and 3.11.2012 respectively with regard to promotion of the petitioners as Junior Engineer Electrical Grade II on par with his immediate junior, who was promoted as Junior Engineer Electrical Grade II, in the light of the order passed in W.P.No.43061/2002, W.P.No.39659/04, W.P.No.39660/04 batch, dated 16.12.2010.
For Petitioners .. Mr.S.N.Ravichandran
For Respondents .. Mr.M.Fakkir Mohideen
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J.)
The petitioners have come up with the above writ petitions seeking a direction to the respondents to consider their representations for promotion to the post of Junior Engineer Electrical Grade II, in the light of the order passed by the learned Judge, setting aside an amendment to the Service Rules.
"27. Therefore all the writ appeals are disposed of to the following effect:
(i) We hold B.P.No.17 dated 05.7.2013 as valid and the order of the learned Judge declaring the said Board proceeding to be bad is set aside.
(ii) However, B.P.No.17 cannot take retrospective effect from 04.4.1987, which is the date on which B.P.No.33 was issued administratively. This is due to the fact that though B.P.No.33 dated 04.4.1987 was followed by other proceedings such as B.P.No.31 dated 12.01.1988, B.P.No.5 dated 26.01.1994, B.P.No.15 dated 05.03.2002 and B.P.No.61 dated 05.11.2002, no amendment to the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations were issued until the issue of B.P.No.17 dated 05.07.2003. Therefore, the attempt
made in B.P.No.17 dated 05.07.2003 to give effect to the amendments issued therein from 04.4.1987, on the basis of the executive instructions, cannot be upheld. Hence, it is declared that B.P.No.17 dated 05.07.2003 will take only prospective effect from 05.7.2003.
(iii) In view of the fact that several persons came to be promoted either by orders of Court or by administrative orders, without reference to the prescription contained in the amendment issued on 05.7.2003, we do not wish to upset the promotions already made, as it may lead to another set of litigations. Therefore, promotions so far made, without reference to the amendment dated 05.07.2003, shall not be reversed.
(iv) There are persons who are similarly placed as those who have got promotions de hors the amendment dated 05.07.2003, on account of the orders issued by this Court both before and after the amendments were struck down by the learned Judge. Since these persons are in no way different from those who have approached Court and obtained orders, their cases may also be considered in exercise of the power of relaxation conferred upon the Board under the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations. Once this is done, these persons who have not been promoted due to the amendment so far, will also become placed on par with those who have been promoted do hors amendment."
msk
To
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,
No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-1
No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002
3.The Superintending Engineer, Krishnagiri Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO Ltd., Krishnagiri District
4.The Superintending Engineer,
Dharmapuri Electricity Distribution Circle,
TANGEDCO Ltd.,
Dharmapuri District
5.The Superintending Engineer,
Tirupattur Electricity Distribution Circle,
TANGEDCO Ltd.,
Tirupattur
1 cc to Mr.M.Fakkir Mohideen, Advocate, Sr. 32562
W.P.Nos.31029 to 31031 of 2012
KJI (CO)
kk 13/7
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to promotion as Junior Engineer Electrical Grade II in light of settled precedents regarding service regulations?
Whether the petitions should be disposed of on the same lines as the operative portion of the order dated 22.6.2015 in W.A.Nos.1571 of 2013?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Murali Rao
M.Balamurali
G.Sathyamoorthy
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.
The Chief Engineer(Personnel), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.
The Superintending Engineer, Krishnagiri Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO Ltd.
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
T.MATHIVANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
