Disposed

C.Ganesan v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC23 Sept 2015WP/29862/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition filed by a school teacher challenging the rejection of his request to ratify study leave for the second year of an M.P.Ed. course. The Court declined to decide the merits immediately.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal petition dated 23.07.2015 on merits within ten weeks.

C.Ganesan Vs The Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 23.09.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN

¶5

W.P.No.29862/2015

¶6

C.Ganesan ..Petitioner Versus

¶7

The Principal Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St George Chennai 600009.

¶8

The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 3. The Joint Director of School Education [Personnel] Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 4. The Chief Educational Officer Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600015.

¶9

The Heamistress Jaygopal Karodia Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Saidapet, Chennai 600015. .. Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to pass appropriate orders on the appeal petition filed by the petitioner dated 23.07.2015 by granting ratification for the study leave availed by the petitioner on loss of pay in the academic year 2013-2014 [from 01.08.2013 to 03.04.2014] to undergo M.P.Ed., 2^nd year course and consequently approve the M.P.Ed. Degree qualification acquired by the petitioner for service benefits within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar, AGP

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

The petitioner was working as Physical Education Teacher in the services of the 5^th respondent/School from the year 2004 onwards and in the year, 2012, the petitioner applied for studying higher degree course, viz., M.P.Ed., on loss of pay and the said course is 2 years degree course and the 4^th respondent has accorded permission vide order dated 12.09.2012, to the petitioner, by granting one year study leave on loss of pay from 01.08.2012. The petitioner, on completion of the first year, joined service on 12.04.2013 and he was permitted to join also and thereafter, the petitioner submitted a representation during June 2013 which was forwarded by the 5^th respondent to the 4^th respondent for permission to study the 2^nd year M.P.Ed., degree on loss of pay and the reminder was also sent and in the mean time, the petitioner applied for study leave from 01.08.2013 and completed the second year. The petitioner also submitted a representation to join the services during April 2014 and accordingly, the petitioner was permitted to join the services without prejudice to the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him for having done the second year degree course, without obtaining proper permission. Ultimately, the 3^rd respondent, vide order dated 05.01.2015, has rejected the request made by the petitioner to ratify the study leave for undergoing the 2^nd year M.P.Ed., course and challenging the same, the preferred an appeal petition dated 23.07.2015 to the 1^st respondent and since no orders have been passed, the petitioner came forward to file this writ petition.

¶17

Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶18

This Court, taking into consideration the limited scope of prayer sought for by the petitioner and without going into the merits of the same, directs the 1^st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal petition dated 23.07.2015 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken to the petitioner.

¶19

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶20

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

The Principal Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St George Chennai 600009. 2. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 3. The Joint Director of School Education [Personnel] Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 4. The Chief Educational Officer Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600015. 5. The Heamistress Jaygopal Karodia Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Saidapet, Chennai 600015. +1 C.C. To MR.G.Sankaran, Advocate in SR.NO.52229 +1 C.C. To Government Pleader in SR.NO.52144 W.P.No.29862/2015

¶26

GGK(CO) sd : 14/10/2015

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Ganesan v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Ganesan v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Jayababu Vs The Commissioner

Tmt.Rajeswari Vs The Principal Secretary to

R.Balaji Vs The Senior Regional Manager

C.Devarajulu Vs The District Collector

P.Ramakrishnan Vs The Registrar of Co-Operative

M.Indirani, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer