The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing registration of a sale deed without an NOC from the Wakf Board. The writ was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent and offered no representation on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.04.2013
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
Writ Petition No. 27570 of 2010
Fairose Alikhan .. Petitioner
Versus
1. The Secretary to Government
of Tamil Nadu
Commercial Taxes Department
Fort St. George
Chennai – 600 009
2. The Inspector General of Registration
Santhome
Chennai – 600 028
3. The Joint Sub-Registrar I
North Chennai
Rajaji Salai
Chennai – 600 001 .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second and third respondents to register the sale deed dated 07.10.2010 pending Document No. 62 of 2010 pertaining to the superstructure, house and building bearing Municipal Old Door No.22B, Old No.49, Maraickar Lubbai Street, Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001, land comprised in R.S. No.3641/1 of VOC Nagar Revenue Division, Fort Tondiarpet Taluk, measuring an extent of 910 square feet of land belonging to Edgah Mosque Charities, Angappa Naicken Street, Chennai – 600 001 situated within the Registration District of North Chennai and SubRegistration District of Joint Sub-Registrar-I of North Chennai without insisting No Objection Certificate from the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Chennai.
For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr. K.V. Dhanapalan Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 06.03.2013, there was no representation for the petitioner and the petitioner was
also not present. Therefore, the writ petition was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' and accordingly, the writ petition is listed for hearing today. Even today, there is no representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is also not present. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.
Sd/
Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
rsh
To
1. The Secretary to Government
of Tamil Nadu
Commercial Taxes Department
Fort St. George
Chennai – 600 009
2. The Inspector General of Registration
Santhome
Chennai – 600 028
3. The Joint Sub-Registrar I
North Chennai
Rajaji Salai
Chennai – 600 001
WP No. 27570 of 2010
MG(CO)
MS:23/04/2013
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Fairose Alikhan
The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Commercial Taxes Department
The Inspector General of Registration
The Joint Sub-Registrar I, North Chennai
N. Paul Vasantakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
