Ms.Vidya Raja v. M/S.Central Institute of
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order holding the writ petition closed because the viability of removing bunds depends on the outcome of a related writ petition (No. 27218 of 2007) concerning survey action by the second respondent.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition declared closed pending action under related writ petition No. 27218 of 2007.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 10.03.2015
Coram:
The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice M.M. SUNDRESH
Writ Petition No. 27219 of 2007
Ms. Vidya Raja .. Petitioner vs.
- Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture rep. by its Director No.75, Santhome High Road R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028.
- The Chairman Pollution Control Board Pollution Control Board Buildings Guindy, Chennai 600032.
- The Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram. .. Respondents --PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Collector, Kancheepuram district, the 3rd respondent herein, to immediately demolish the bunds already put up by the Central Institute of Brackish water, the 1st respondent herein on the Muthukadu back waters situate in S.No.113, Muthukadu Village, Chengalput District in contravention of the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification dated 19.02.1991 and in compliance with the direction of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of S.Jagannathan vs. Union of India, reported in 1997 (2) SCC 87 and submit a compliance report before this Honourable Court. --For Petitioner : Ms. C. Uma For Respondents: Mr. S.T.S. Murthi Govt. Pleader for R3 Mr. S.R. Sundaram for R1 Mrs. Rita Chandrasekaran for R2 Mr. T. Mohan (Advocate Commissioner).
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for removal of bunds requires independent adjudication or is subsumed under a related writ petition regarding survey action by the Pollution Control Board.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vidya Raja
- respondent
Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture
- respondent
Pollution Control Board
- respondent
Collector, Kancheepuram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court