Disposed

P.Mahavishnu v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC8 Dec 2015WP/24402/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This batch of writ petitions sought a direction to the Regional Transport Officer to receive applications for autorickshaw permits. The Court disposed of the petitions by ordering the Authority to accept the applications and decide them on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Regional Transport Officer to receive the applications, consider them, and pass orders for grant of autorickshaw permits within four weeks.

P.Mahavishnu Vs The Transport Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.12.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.24402 to 24411 of 2015

¶6

P. Mahavishnu ...Petitioner in WP No.24402/15 S.SriDevi ...Petitioner in WP.No.24403/15 A.Radhika ...Petitioner in WP.NO.24404/15 M.Jaganathan ...Petitioner in WP.No.24405/15 Siva ...Petitioner in WP.No.24406/15 R.Loganayaki ...Petitioner in WP.NO.24407/15 Vadivu ...Petitioner in WP.No.24408/15 K.Khamardheen ...Petitioner in WP.No.24409/15 A.Rehman ...Petitioner in WP.NO.24410/15 M.Bhavani ...Petitioner in WP.No.24411/15 Vs 1 The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai 5 2 The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North-East), Chennai Respondents in all the WPs

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 20.07.2015 in Form CCPA with the prescribed fee for grant of Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and to pass orders in accordance with law.

¶8

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking the common relief of issuing a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Regional Transport Authority concerned to receive the respective application of the petitioners in Form CCPA and the prescribed

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

fee for the grant of autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

Mr.M.S.Ramesh, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respective respondents.

¶12

Without going into the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respective concerned Regional Transport Officer to receive the respective applications of the petitioners, consider the same and pass appropriate orders for grant of autorickshaw permit, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶13

No costs.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
Msr
To
1 The Transport Commissioner
State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai 5
2 The Regional Transport Officer,
Cjemmao (North-East), Chennai.
+1 cc to Government pleader sr.65939

¶14

W.P.Nos.24402 to 24411 of 2015

¶15

aa22/12/2015

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Mahavishnu v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Mahavishnu v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.K.Rathinavel Mudaliar and Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Tvl.Sri Ram Trading Company, Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Tvl Seven Hills Medtech Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

B.Pondidurai, Vs the District Collector

M/s.Prime Hitech Engineering Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Infinite Leathers (P) Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)