The Court dismissed a writ petition filed for promotion and arrears of benefits. It held the petition was not maintainable due to prior proceedings and directed the petitioner to file a contempt petition or challenge specific orders as appropriate.
No costs to any party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.07.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
W.P.No.22258 of 2015
K.Nagarajan
... Petitioner
Versus
PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to give promotional avenues on par with the petitioner's junior and category personnel, particularly compliance of the order of this Court in W.P.No.31025 of 2006 (O.A.No.711/1998) dated 26.11.2008 and implementation of the G.O.Ms.No.1710, Home (Police -9) Department dated 23.11.2007 and consequently direct the respondents to effect the petitioner's due promotion on par with the petitioner's junior and category personnel and consequently release the arrears of monetary benefits available to the petitioner with retrospective effect ie., from the date of enlistment on 11.12.1979 till retirement on 31.10.2014 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2015.
For Petitioner : M/s.R.Thanjan
For Respondents
: Mr.K.Rajendraprasad Govt. Advocate
O R D E R
By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
3.Since the respondents did not consider and pass orders, the petitioner has again approached this Court with the same prayer.
W.P.No.22258 of 2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking promotion and arrears of monetary benefits is maintainable when the petitioner had previously approached the Court with similar prayers.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Nagarajan
The State of Tamil Nadu
D.Hariparanthaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
