Petitioners sought a writ of Mandamus to restrain the respondent bank from auctioning jewels secured under loan agreements. The court dismissed the petitions as no relief was sought/viable since appropriate orders were passed in connected matters.
Writ petitions dismissed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.12.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
W.P.Nos.21986 & 21987 of 2014
B.S.Venkatesan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.21986/2014 B.Selvi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.21987/2014 -vsThe Branch Manager Canara Bank Thiyagarajapuram Branch, Vellore 632 001. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondent from auction in the jewels in Jewels Loan Nos. 0988842024832 & 0988842024833 on 14.8.2014 or on any subsequent date. For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Manoj Kumar
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for is no longer survives since already appropriate orders have been passed in the connected matters.
Sd/
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-IV)
/TRUE COPY/
SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
smi
+1 CC to MR.T.S.Gopalan & Co Advocate. SR.NO. 55030
+2 CC to MR.A.K.Manoj Kumar Advocate. SR.NO. 66559, 66560
W.P.No.21986 & 21987 of 2014
CO-
JD 18/12/2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.S.Venkatesan
B.Selvi
The Branch Manager Canara Bank Thiyagarajapuram Branch, Vellore
M.M.Sundresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
