V.Kannan v. Presiding Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition to approach DRT. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application before DRT if advised.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to file fresh application before DRT.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.07.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL
W.P. No.21454 of 2015
and
M.P. Nos 1 & 2 of 2015
V. Kannan ...Petitioner
Vs.
1 The Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal – 2
IV Floor
DEVA Towers
770 A, Anna Salai
Chennai 600 002
2 Indian Bank
(a Government of India undertaking)
Nungambakkam Branch
125 Valluvar Kottam High Road
Nungambakkam
Chennai 600 034
3 V. Venugopal ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the
records under the impugned order dated 07.07.2015 in SA SR
No.4898/2015 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same
and further direct the first respondent to number SA SR No.4898/2015
and decide the same on merits.
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY
All that piece and parcel of property bearing 43, Kattabomman
7th Street, Kudungaiyur, Chennai 600 118 of an extent of 4,650 sq.
ft., having built up area of House and 534 sq. ft. shed adjacent to the built up area within the Registrar's office of Madhavaram and Registration District of Chennai North.
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a fresh application, as observed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal and has also made an endorsement to that effect:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kannan
- respondent
The Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal – 2
- respondent
Indian Bank
- respondent
V. Venugopal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court