Disposed

M.Fazlur Rahman, v. The Director of Animal

Madras HC16 Jul 2015WP/21344/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge in the Madras High Court directed the Director of Animal Husbandry to reconsider the petitioner's pending representation regarding promotion to Senior Veterinary Live Stock Inspector, considering specific administrative recommendations, and to pass an order on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation based on departmental recommendations and pass an order on merits within four weeks.

M.Fazlur Rahman, Vs The Director of Animal — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.07.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

W.P.No.21344 of 2015

M.Fazlur Rahman

... Petitioner

-Versus-
1.The Director of Animal Husbandry
and Veterinary Services,
Chennai 600 006.
2.The Regional Joint Director of Animal Husbandry,
Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.
3.The Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry,
Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.
4.Mr.Gunasekara Pandian,
Live Stock Inspector Grade-I,
Veterinary Sub Centre,
Thiruneermalai,
Kancheepuram.
...Respondents

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the Panel relating to promotion to the post of Senior Veterinary Live Stock Inspectors as on 01.07.2014 issued by the 1^st respondent in Na.Ka.No.46658/E1/2014 dated 16.02.2015 and to quash the above said panel insofar as the inclusion of the 4^th respondent is concerned and to consequently direct the respondents to include the petitioner's name against Sl.No.65 in the place of the 4^th respondent and grant him all consequential benefits.

¶10

For petitioner : Mr.P.Manojkumar For respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan,

¶11

Spl. Government Pleader

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner is a Live Stock Inspector Grade-I and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ working at the Veterinary Sub Centre, Thookanambakkam in Cuddalore

¶14

District. He questioned the panel relating to promotion to the post of Senior Veterinary Live Stock Inspectors as on 01.07.2014 issued by the 1^st respondent insofar as the inclusion of the name of the 4^th respondent is concerned.

¶15

I have heard Mr.P.Rajendran, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, the learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents and also perused the records carefully.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner would, during the course of hearing of this writ petition, submit that though the writ petition is for a larger relief, the petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to the 1^st respondent to consider the representation the petitioner dated 25.02.2015 in the light of the letter of the Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry, Cuddalore, dated 01.10.2014 in Ref. No.3283/B1/2014 and the letter of the Regional Director of Animal Husbandry, Cuddalore dated 30.12.2014 in ref. Na.Ka.No.3072/B1/2014 and dispose of the same within a stipulated time. The said statement is recorded.

¶17

Considering the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the representation of the petitioner requesting to include his name in the panel at an appropriate place for promotion to the post of Senior Veterinary Live Stock Inspector as on 01.07.2014 is pending, this court directs the 1^st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.02.2015 in the light of the recommendations of the Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry, Cuddalore and the Regional Director of Animal Husbandry, Cuddalore referred to above and pass orders on merits on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶18

kmk

¶19

¶20

1.The Director of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Chennai 600 006. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

2.The Regional Joint Director of Animal Husbandry, Cuddalore Cuddalore District.

¶22

3.The Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶23

4.Mr.Gunasekara Pandian, Live Stock Inspector Grade-I, Veterinary Sub Centre, Thiruneermalai, Kancheepuram.

¶24

1 cc to Mr.P.Manojkumar,Advocate(SR.36285)
+1 cc to Government Pleader (Sr.3643)
W.P.No.21344 of 2015
Kji(co)
cp 10.08.2015

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Fazlur Rahman, v. The Director of Animal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Fazlur Rahman, v. The Director of Animal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Selvam Vs The Chairman

R.Pandi, Vs State of Tamilnadu

G.Anandavel Vs The State of Tamilnadu

S.Vinayagamoorthy, Vs State of Tamilnadu

P.Subramanian, Vs The District Collector /

V.Srinivasan @ v.Seeni Vs The Commissioner