Petitioner sought writ for pensionary benefits under a Government Order. The court concluded that the respondent had already granted the benefits via an order dated 23.01.2015, leaving nothing for adjudication, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as respondent had already granted benefits; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURDE AT MADRAS
Dated: 10.02.2015
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice K.K.SASIDHARAN
W.P.No.20725 of 2014
M.Govindasamy .. Petitioner
vs.
The Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable
Endowment Department,
Chennai-600 034 .. Respondent
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondent to grant pensionary benefits, dearness allowance and other benefits as per G.O.No.363/2013 dated 23.08.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sumitra
For respondent : Mr.M.L.Mahendran,G.A.
ORDER
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant him pensionary benefits, dearness allowance and other statutory benefits, pursuant to the Government Order in G.O.No.363 of 2013, dated 23.08.2013.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
msk
To
The Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable
Endowment Department,
Chennai-600 034
+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR NO.7431.
+1 CC TO MR.G.SUMITRA ADVOCATE SR NO.7053.
SKV[CO]
RD 21/02/2015
W.P.No.20725 of 2014
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication after the respondent granted the requested pensionary benefits via an order dated 23.01.2015
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Govindasamy
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai
K.K. Sasidharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
