Dismissed

Union of India owning Bharat v. R.Anbupalamnee

Madras HC10 Jul 2015WP/20517/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A common order dismissing five writ petitions filed by BSNL challenging orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding employee regularization. The High Court followed a prior Division Bench dismissal of similar petitions and disposed of the matter in the same manner.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed the writ petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions; no costs awarded.

Union of India owning Bharat Vs R.Anbupalamnee — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 10.07.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.20517 to 20520 of 2015
and
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015
1.Union of India owning Bharat Sanchar
Nigam Limited (BSNL),
rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director,
Sanchar Bhavan, Janpath,
New Delhi-110 001
2.The Chief General Manager,
TN Circle, BSNL,
No.80, Anna Salai,
Chennai-600 002
3.The General Manager,
BSNL,
Dharmapuri Division,
Dharmapuri-636 701 ... Petitioners in 1 & 2
all the W.Ps.
3rd Petitioner in
WP.No.20517/15
The General Manager
BSNL
Puducherry Division Puducherry-605 001 ...3rd Petitioner in
WP.No.20518/2015
The General Manager
BSNL Salem Division
No.1 Rosari Road, Peramanur
Salem 636 007 ...3rd Petitioner in
WP.No.20519/2015
The General Manager
BSNL Tuticorin Division,
Tuticorin-628 001 ...3rd Petitioner in
WP.No.20520/2015
vs.

¶6

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶7

1.R.Anbupalamnee
2.R.Ilangovan
3.The Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras Bench,
City Civil Court Buildings,
Chennai-104 ... Respondents
in W.P.No.20517 of 2015
1.R.Indrakumar
2.The Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras Bench,
City Civil Court Buildings,
Chennai-104 .. Respondents in
W.P.No.20518 of 2015
1.M.Gunasekaran
2.C.Saravanan
3.R.Uma Maheswari
4.C.A.Sathiyabhama
5.P.S.Ravi
6.R.Vaibogam
7.R.Balu
8.The Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras Bench,
City Civil Court Buildings,
Chennai-104 ... Respondents in
W.P.No.20519 of 2015
1.T.Ratha Rukmani
2.G.Vishalaxshi
3.The Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras Bench,
City Civil Court Buildings,
Chennai-104 .... Respondents in
W.P.No.20520 of 2015

¶8

Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the third/second/eighth respondent (Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench), culminating in the impugned order dated 2.5.2014 in O.A.Nos.310/00365, 310/00298, 310/00367 and 310/00366 of 2014, respectively, and to quash the same.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioners .. Mr.M.Vaidyanathan in all WPs

¶11

COMMON ORDER

¶12

(Order of the Court was made by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J.)

¶13

These writ petitions are filed by the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, in a batch of applications.

¶14

Heard Mr.M.Vaidyanathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶15

By a common order passed on 2.5.2014, in a batch of applications in O.A.Nos.587 of 2013 etc. the Central Administrative Tribunal allowed the claim of the employees for the preparation of year wise panels and for considering the cases of the respondents for regularisation against such vacancies on the basis of seniority. As against the said common order, a batch of three writ petitions came up before us earlier in W.P.Nos.15509, 20660 and 22162 of 2014. These writ petitions were dismissed by a Division Bench, to which one of us (V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J) was a party, by a common order dated 26.3.2015. Therefore, the present writ petitions also deserve to meet with the same fate. Hence, following the order passed in W.P.Nos.15509, 20660 and 22162 of 2014, dated 26.3.2015, these writ petitions are also dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.

¶16

-s/dAssistant Registrar(CSIII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶17

msk To The Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, City Civil Court Buildings, Chennai-104

¶18

+1 cc to M/s.M.Vaidyanathan Advocate sr.35320

¶19

W.P.Nos.20517 to 20520 of 2015

¶20

aa31/07/2015

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Union of India owning Bharat v. R.Anbupalamnee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India owning Bharat v. R.Anbupalamnee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Sukanya, W/o.J.Parthasarathy Vs Union of India

S.Padmavathy Vs The Registrar General

Dr.M.Rajesekaran Vs Union of India

Mr. Mohana R. Reve Vs Mrs Premlatha D. Reddi

Metropolitan Transport Vs M. Nirmala

The Divisional Manger Vs Mr.S.Rajasekar