R.Arjunan v. a.Madhusoodhanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.03.2015
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Ramanathan
W.P.No.19097 of 2013
R.Arjunan ...Petitioner
vs. 1.A.Madhusoodhanan 2.Sangeetha Rathinpuri Police Station, (Law and Order) Coimbatore City.
3.The Inspector of Police, Rathinpuri Police Station, (Law and Order), Coimbatore City. ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent, the Inspector of Police, Rathinpuri Police Station (Law and Order), Coimbatore City to take action on the complaint given by the petitioner on 07.09.2011 in petition No.3853786.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Deivasigamani For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja Addl. Public Prosecutor R3
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R Arjunan
- respondent
Sangeetha Rathinpuri Police Station, (Law and Order) Coimbatore City
- respondent
Inspector of Police, Rathinpuri Police Station, (Law and Order), Coimbatore City
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court