Allowed

C.Murugan v. The Director Generl of

Madras HC11 Jun 2015WP/16608/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition filed by a Sub Inspector of Police against police officials seeking a direction to dispose within eight weeks of an appeal against an increment postponement punishment. The single judge directed the first respondent to dispose the appeal on merits within a specified time.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 12.06.2014 on merits within eight weeks.

C.Murugan Vs The Director Generl of — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 11.6.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

¶5

Writ Petition No.16608 of 2015

¶6

C.Murugan ... Petitioner

¶7

vs. 1. The Director General ofPolice, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore Chennai.

¶8

The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Police, Chennai-7

¶9

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai ... Respondents

¶10

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner appeal dated 12.6.2014 within a limited time frame as deem fit by this Honourable court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Esakkiappan For Respondents : Mrs.M.E.Rani Selvam, Additional Government Pleader

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

Mrs. M.E.Raniselvam, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for respondents.

¶14

The petitioner is a Sub Inspector of Police. He was imposed with the punishment of postponement of increment for two years. It shall operate to postpone his future increments with cumulative effect. The punishment order was issued by the second respondent. He preferred an appeal on 12.6.2014 to the first respondent. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the aforesaid appeal.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

In view of the narrow prayer made, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal dated 12.06.2014 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS V)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar
kua
To
1. The Director General ofPolice,
Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore
Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Police
Greater Chennai Police, Chennai-7
3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police,
Madurai Range, Madurai
+1cc to Mr.A.Esakiappan, Advocate, S.R.No.28378
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.28601
Writ Petition No.16608 of 2015
KGK(CO)
CA(23/06/2015)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Murugan v. The Director Generl of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Murugan v. The Director Generl of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Selvaraj Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

N.Madesh Vs The Deputy Inspector General

S.a.Ramalingam Vs The Registrar of Cooperative

Dr.N.Diviya Vs The Chairman

A. Durairaj Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

K.Loganathan Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu