Disposed

Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC10 Jun 2015WP/16381/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by a teachers' association under Article 226 praying for allotment of posts via a 1997 G.O. The Hon'ble Chief Justice directed the Second Respondent to dispose of the representation within three months and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Second Respondent directed to consider the representation dated 27.01.2015 and dispose of it within three months.

Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated: 10.06.2015

¶3

Coram:

¶4

The Honourable Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

Writ Petition No.16381 of 2015

¶6

Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Postgraduate Teacher's Association (Registration No.160/1980) represented by its Legal Wing Secretary, R.Srinivasan No.159, Gengu Reddy Salai Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Principal Secretary School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600009. 2.The Director of School Education DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600006. .. Respondents.

¶8

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner's association dated 27.01.2015 and accordingly sanction and allot postgraduate teachers to the Government Higher Secondary Schools in various districts in the State of Tamil Nadu in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.525, School Education Department, dated 29.12.1997 within a time frame.

¶9

For Petitioner ::: Mr.Dakshayani Reddy

¶10

For Respondents ::: Mr.D.Krishnakumar Special Government Pleader (Education)

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

(The Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice)

¶14

On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, we direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.01.2015 and dispose it of within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order, in accordance with law.

¶15

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.

¶16

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CO)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
ksr
Copy to:
1.The Principal Secretary
State of Tamil Nadu,
School Education Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai 600009.
2.The Director of School Education
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai 600006.
1 cc to Mrs.Dakshayani Reddy, Advocate, Sr. 27819
1 cc to Government Pleader, Sr. 28235
W.P.No.16381 of 2015
KU(CO)
kk 19/6

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.a.Rajendran Poosari Vs Jeyavelanpoosari

U.Kasipandian, Advocate Vs The Secretary, Govt of India

M.R.Saravanan, S/o.L.Rajagopal Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Vasanthakumar Vengadessane, Vs The Registrar General

R.Lakshmikanthan Vs S.Ayyasamy

Karivetty, Kathalai, Mummudi Vs State of Tamilnadu