Allowed

R.T.L.Chandar Old No. v. The Joint Commissioner of

Madras HC3 Aug 2015WP/14640/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Public interest litigation filed regarding delayed disposal of a representation concerning police obstruction of a land survey. The court directed the third respondent (Inspector of Police) to conclude the inquiry within four weeks and dismissed the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent to conclude the enquiry within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

R.T.L.Chandar Old No. Vs The Joint… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 03.08.2015

¶3

CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.14640 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 R.T.L.Chandar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Greater Chennai, Butt Road, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai - 16. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adyar District, J-2 Adyar Police Station, L.B. Road, Adyar, Chennai - 20. 3.The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, J-8 Neelankarai Police Station, Chennai - 41. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 08.05.2015 within a time frame.

¶4

Claiming to be the owner of the property situated in Old Pimash No.341 A, New Survey No.227/8B, Kottivakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, the petitioner gave a representation to the respondents on 08.05.2015 alleging that one Prithviraj and his men are preventing the Surveyor and other officials from surveying the land. Further allegation has been made to the effect that the petitioner was also prevented from entering into his property. As the

¶5

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶6

said representation has not been disposed of, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶7

2.As the representation has been pending consideration before the third respondent, the said respondent is directed to conclude the enquiry within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶8

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶9

True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
mmi
To
1.The Joint Commissioner of
Police, South Zone,
Greater Chennai, Butt Road,
St. Thomas Mount,
Chennai - 16.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of
Police, Adyar District,
J-2 Adyar Police Station,
L.B. Road, Adyar, Chennai - 20.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Law and Order,
J-8 Neelankarai Police Station,
Chennai - 41.
W.P.No.14640 of 2015
sv(co)
pmk.13.8.2015

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.T.L.Chandar Old No. v. The Joint Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.T.L.Chandar Old No. v. The Joint Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alwin Rotrico Vs the Inspector of Police

Dr. P. Saravanan Vs C. Karpagavalli

S. Raja @ Parthiparaja Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

The Lords International School Vs the Chief Executive and

M/s. Amit Weaving Mills Vs The Director

G.Kuppammal Vs The Assistant Commissioner