Dismissed

The Coimbatore Dt. Consumers v. Presiding Officer

Madras HC7 Dec 2015WP/12439/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a cooperative society challenging Labour Court, Coimbatore orders. The petitions were formally dismissed as withdrawn by the counsel, with no substantive adjudication on the merits.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions and all connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.

The Coimbatore Dt. Consumers Vs Presiding Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.12.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

W.P.Nos.12439 to 12442 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.Nos.15614, 15615, 15617, 15618, 15620, 15621, 15623 and 15624 of 2003

¶6

The Coimbatore District Consumers Cooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd., rep. by its General Manager, R.s.Puram (Po), Coimbatore-641 002. ...Petitioner in all WPs Vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore. ...Respondent 1 in all WPs G.Kamalam ...Respondent 2 in WP.12439/03 S.Ponnammal ...Respondent 2 in WP.12440/03 M.Palaniammal ...Respondent 2 in WP.12441/03 T.Ramaswamy ...Respondent 2 in WP.12442/03 Labour Officer, Coimbatore-641 018. ...Respondent 3 in all WPs

¶7

Prayer :- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Labour Court, Coimbatore, the first respondent herein pertaining to its order in I.D.Nos.313, 314, 315, 316 of 1999 dated 13.11.2000 and quash the same and consequently direct the said Labour Court to drop further proceedings in the c.P.No.142, 138, 139, 140 of 2001 filed by the second respondent and direct the Labour Officer, Coimbatore to drop further action on the complaint in his File No.1713 of 2001.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Anbarasan in all WPs.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Respondents : Mr.Noorullah for M/s.K.V.Shanmuganathan Associates for R2

¶11

Mr.R.Vijayakumar Addl. G.P. For R3

¶12

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, all connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To
1. President Officer,
Labour Court,
Coimbatore.
2. Labour Officer,
Coimbatore-641 018.
3.The Section, Officer,
VR Section,
High Court, Madras [31/05/2016]
+1cc to Mr.P.Anbarasan, Advocate, S.R.No.65589
W.P.Nos.12439 to 12442 of 2003

¶15

RSK(CO) CA(16/12/2015)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Coimbatore Dt. Consumers v. Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Coimbatore Dt. Consumers v. Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Poochi Vs The District Collector

S.Ravichandran, Vs The Director

Food Corporation of India Vs The Deputy Director

Shri Lakshmi Spinners Ltd. Vs Govt of Tn. Rep by Its

Tamilnadu Tourism Development Vs the Commissioner of Labour

The Bombay Burmah Trading Vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Board