Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus for consideration of a representation was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue administratively.
No relief granted as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.04.2015
CORAM:
The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and
The Honourable Mr. Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Writ Petition No.11713 of 2015
M. Muthiyahdesigar .. Petitioner
vs.
1. The District Collector
Collector Office
Villupuram District
2. The Block Development Officer
The Block Development Office
Kandamangalam Union
Villupuram District. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 21.7.2014.
After making some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the matter administratively, if feasible.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Copies to;
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Muthiyahdesigar
The District Collector
The Block Development Officer
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
T.S. Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
