G.Durai, v. The Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 regarding the implementation of the IAY Scheme. Noting the matter was under RTI processes, the court directed authorities to complete the examination within three months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.04.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.10795 of 2015
G.Durai ...Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Secretary,
Government of Tamilnadu,
Department of Local Administration,
Fort St. George,
Chennai-5.
2. The Director,
Panchayat Raj and Rural Administration,
Panagal Maaligai,
Saidapet, Chennai-600 015.
3. The Collector,
Krishnagiri District,
Krishnagiri.
4. The Project Officer,
District Rural Development Agency,
Indira Awaas Yojana Scheme,
Krishnagiri.
5. The Block Development Officer,
Kelamangalam Panchayat Union,
Kelamangalam, Krishnagiri District.
6. Valli Subramani,
President,
Royakottai Panchayat,
Royakottai,
Krishnagiri District. ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dated 19.01.2015 requesting them to implement the IAY Scheme (Indira Awaas Yojana) strictly in accordance with the guidelines framed by the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India and to take action against the 6th respondent for her illegal action in implementing the said scheme in Royakottai Panchayat during the period from 2011 to 2014 in accordance with law, within a time frame stipulated by this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authorities should implement the IAY Scheme strictly in accordance with guidelines and take action against the 6th respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Durai
- respondent
The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu
- respondent
The Director, Panchayat Raj and Rural Administration
- respondent
The Collector, Krishnagiri District
- respondent
The Project Officer, District Rural Development Agency
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court