M/s.Helios and Matheson v. The State
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 seeking declaration regarding applicability of TNPID Act to information technology companies was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Writ petition under Article 226 seeking declaration regarding applicability of TNPID Act to information technology companies was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.04.2015
CORAM
The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.10015 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
M/s.Helios and Matheson Information Technology Ltd., Rep. by its
Authorized Signatory, Mr.K.M.Kumar. .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The State, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.
2.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai.
3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, EOW-II, Anna Nagar, Chennai. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Declaration to declare that the provisions of the TNPID Act, 1997, as inapplicable to companies receiving deposits under the Companies Act (S.58 of the Old Act of 1956 and S.73-76 of the New Act of 2013) which are not 'Non Banking Finance Corporations' nor 'Financial Establishments'.
For Petitioner : Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj For Respondents : Mr.S.T.S.Moorthy,
Govt. Pleader.
After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition and states that he reserves liberty to move appropriate quashing proceedings, in which he will raise the issues, as are sought to be canvassed before this Court.
2.Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in aforesaid terms. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2015 is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The State,
rep. by the Secretary to Government,
Home Department, Fort St. George,
Chennai.
2.The Director General of Police,
Mylapore, Chennai.
3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
EOW-II, Anna Nagar, Chennai.
+1 cc to M/s.Nithyaesh & Vaibhav, Advocates,SR.19189
+1 cc to Government Pleader,SR.19110.
ppa(co)
krd 21/4
W.P.No.10015 of 2015
M/s Helios and Matheson Information Technology Ltd.
The State
The Director General of Police
The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
T.S. Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court