Single Judges dismissed a writ petition seeking release of a confiscated vehicle. The Division Bench affirmed the Single Judge's decision to dismiss the subsequent writ appeal, holding that no further consideration was available at that stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-04-2015
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI and
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL
W.A.No.607 of 2015 and M.P. No.1 of 2015
M. Yuvaraj ...Appellant/Petitioner
Vs. 1. The District Revenue Officer Vellore Vellore District
Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed in W.P.No.550 of 2015 dated 27-01-2015.
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to forthwith release the vehicle Skoda Car bearing Regn.No.TN-07-BE-0505, which belongs to the petitioner within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.
Heard Mr. S. Shanmugavelayutham, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. N. Sakthivel, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. With consent, the writ appeal is taken up for final hearing.
M. Yuvaraj
The District Revenue Officer Vellore
Inspector of Police CSCID Vellore
Satish K. Agnihotri
M. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
