The Division Bench disposed of writ appeal preferring a writ petition challenging certification of selection lists. The court dismissed the appeal unanimously, upholding the Single Judge's view that the selection process was concluded and the appeal lacked merit.
Writ appeal dismissed with no costs awarded to either party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.01.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL
W.A.No.5 of 2015
D.Raveendran .. Appellant/Petitioner
Vs. 1.Teachers Recruitment Board, rep by its Chairman, 4th Floor, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, College Road, Chennai-6. 2.Director of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai-32. .. Respondents/Respondents
This writ appeal is preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of this court dated 03.07.2014 made in W.P.No.26629 of 2012.
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India, for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the Tentative Provisional Selection List of candidates selected for appointment in the post of P.G.Assistant Economics for the year 2010-2011 published on 4.4.2012 by the 1st respondent herein and quash the same in so far as the same relates to the selection of candidates based on the employment seniority counted from the date of registration of P.G.Qualification of the candidates instead of the date of registration of B.Ed. qualification and GT (Priority) candidates are concerned and consequentially direct the respondetns 1 and 2 herein to consider the petitioner herein for selection for the post of P.G.Assistant - Economics in accordance with his Employment registration seniority and rule of reservation.
The appellant / writ petitioner preferred the instant writ petition on 19.09.2012, seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus or
any other writ or a direction to quash the provisional selection list of candidates selected for appointment on the post of P.G. AssistantEconomics for the year 2010-2011 published on 04.04.2012 so far as the same relates to the selection of candidates based on the employment seniority counted from the date of registration of P.G. qualification of the candidates instead of the date of registration of B.Ed qualification and G.T (Priority) candidates and a further direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner / appellant for selection on the post of P.G. Assistant -Economics in accordance with his employment registration seniority.
Sd/Assistant Registrar Dated:2.2.15
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1 cc to M/s.V.R.Rajasekaran, Advocate,SR.3340.
ug(co)
krd 6/2
W.A.No.5 of 2015
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the selection process based on PG qualification seniority was contrary to legal provisions.
Whether the Single Judge's view that the selection process was complete warranted dismissal of the appeal.
Whether the selection list regarding PG Assistant Economics appointments should be quashed.
D.Raveendran
Teachers Recruitment Board
Director of Employment and Training
Satish K. Agnihotri
M. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
