144. Though the learned single Judge, following the Mridul Dhar v. Union of India and others reported in 2005 (2) SCC 65, Priya Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh reported in 2012 (7) SCC 433 and Manohar Lal Sharma v. Medical Council of India and Others reported in (2013) 10 SCC 60, has rejected the interim prayer, sought for, in M.P.No.2 of 2015 in W.P.No.17985 of 2015, dated 31.07.2015, in the light of the discussion and decisions, stated supra, more particularly, the recent decision in Royal Medical Trust (Regd) v. Union of India [W.P.(C)No.705 of 2014, dated 20.08.2015], We are inclined to interfere with the impugned order, made in this appeal. Accordingly, the order made in M.P.No.2 of 2015 in W.P.No.17985 of 2015, dated 31.07.2015, is set aside. The Secretary, Medical Council of India, New Delhi, 3 rd respondent herein, is directed to consider the compliance report, dated 13.03.2015 and the recommendation of the Committee of the Central Government, in letter, dated 24.03.2015, to review/assess the scheme, in the light of the documents submitted by the appellantCollege, in the compliance report, dated 13.03.2015, by causing inspection of the appellant-College, within a period of one week, from tomorrow, ie., on 04.09.2015 and submit a report to the Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, 1 st respondent herein, within the abovesaid period, who, on receipt of the said report, shall pass orders, in accordance with Section 10-A(4) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, as early as possible and not later than, one week, from the date of recommendation, after inspection by the Medical Council of India and if for any reason, the Central Government proposes to disapprove the scheme, provide an opportunity to the appellantCollege, within the said period of one week, in compliance with the principles of natural justice, set out in the said provision, Section 10-A(4) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.
