The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent and could not be traced, while the respondent did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 16.9.2015
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
and
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.MATHIVANAN
T.C.A.No.2682 of 2006
Hotel Krishna Prasad, Chennai-6. ...Appellant
Vs
The Income Tax Officer, Business Ward XV(4), Chennai. ...Respondent
TAX CASE APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 13.10.2006 made in I.T.A.No.1167/(Mds)/2005 on
the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai for the assessment year 2002-03.
Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Judgment was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J
The learned counsel, who appeared for the appellant passed away. His junior reported that the client could not be traced. Notice sent to the appellant returned with the endorsement 'vacated'.
prosecution.
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J AND T.MATHIVANAN,J
RS
To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai.
T.C.A.No.2682 of 2006
16.9.2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hotel Krishna Prasad
The Income Tax Officer
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
T.MATHIVANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
