Allowed

M.Sundarammal, v. Mr.Paulraj

Madras HC9 Jul 2015SUB A(MD)/145/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous petition, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court condoned the delay in representing a contempt petition upon the petitioner paying Rs. 500 as cost to the Chief Justice Relief Fund for the Nepal Earthquake Tragedy.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 507-day delay in representing a contempt petition on payment of Rs. 500 to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within three weeks.

M.Sundarammal, Vs Mr.Paulraj — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Ninth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT

¶2

The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN SUB A(MD) No.145 of 2015 IN CONT P(MD) No.SR57190 of 2013 IN WP(MD)NO.7922 OF 2006

¶3

1 M.SUNDARAMMAL, 2 MURUGAN ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶4

¶5

MR.PAULRAJ, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION, (PANDIAN ROADWAYS CORPORATION), BYE-PASS ROAD, MADURAI-10. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶6

Petition filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of A.S. Rules praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 507 days in representing the above Contempt Petition SR (MD)NO.57190 of 2013 .

¶7

WP(MD)NO.7922 OF 2006: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the Order passed by the Ist respondent/Labour Court, Madurai in C.P.No.106 of 1997 dated 22/06/2006 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2^nd respondent to pay the petitioner's a total sum of Rs.2,47,000/- with interest.

¶8

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. R.ARAVINDAN, Advocate for the petitioner the Court made the following order:-

¶9

The delay in representing the Contempt Petition is condoned on payment of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five hundred only) payable to the Chief Justice Relief Fund to be forwarded to the persons who affected in Nepal Earthquake Tragedy. The said amount shall be paid within a period of three weeks from today.

sd/-

09/07/2015

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶14

¶15

1.MR.PAULRAJ,

¶16

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION, (PANDIAN ROADWAYS CORPORATION), BYE-PASS ROAD, MADURAI-10.

¶17

2.THE SECTION OFFICER, ACCOUNTS SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶18

RL/3C – 14/7/2015

¶19

¶20

WP(MD)NO.7922 OF 2006

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Sundarammal, v. Mr.Paulraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Sundarammal, v. Mr.Paulraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Murali, S/O Soundara- Vs the Regional Joint Director

Andiappan Vs the District Collector

Ra. Vijippriya, Vs the Member Secretary

M.Ganesan Vs the Director General of

D.T.Ramila Vs the Registrar of Cooperative

A. Gandhi, Vs the Director of School