The suit in O.S.No.4451/2006 was filed by the appellants herein against the respondents for partition and also for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants 1 and 2 from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The first defendant in the suit Mr.S.R.K.P.Srinivasan made a Counter-Claim for recovery of possession of the suit property from the plaintiffs and for damages for use and occupation. The VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, by a decree and judgment dated 19.01.2012 dismissed the suit, but decreed the Counter-Claim thereby directing the plaintiffs to deliver vacant possession of the suit property to the defendants 1 and 2 within three months i.e. on or before 18.03.2012. So far as the damages and future damages are concerned, the trial court dismissed the claim. As against the same, the appellants have filed an appeal in A.S.No.105/2012. As against the denial of the prayer for damages, the first defendant filed an appeal in A.S.No.128/2012. The lower appellate court, by a common judgment and decree dated 03.09.2012 dismissed both the appeals. As against the dismissal of A.S.No.105/2012, the appellants have come up with S.A.No.701 of 2005. As against certain conclusions arrived at by the lower appellate court in A.S.No.128/2012, the appellants have filed a separate appeal in S.A.No.700 of 2015. The defendants 1 and 2 have not filed any appeal against A.S.No.128/2012. That is how these second appeals are before this court for admission.