The High Court dismissed the second appeal filed under section 100 of the CPC for default proceedings, as the learned counsel for the appellant was not present and appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matter. No costs were awarded.
The second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs are awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
S.A.No.475 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
Kuppusamy (died) represented by his LRs 1.K.Kamalaveni 2.K.Dhandapani 3.K.Dhamodaran 4.K.Bhuvaneswari .. Appellants/Appellants/ Plaintiffs -Vs-
1.M.Ramadass 2.R.Rangarajan 3.R.Latchumanan 4.R.Ramachandran .. Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants
Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the decree and judgment dated 11.03.2013 passed in A.S.No.37 of 2011 on the file of the 1st Additional Sub-Ordinate Court at Court Villupuram, Villupuram District confirming the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2010 passed in O.S.No.47 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court at Villupuram, Villupuram District.
For Appellants : Mr.V.Rajendran
JUDGMENT
On 26.11.2015, when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the appellants was not ready. Hence, the matter was ordered to be listed on 27.11.2015 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 27.11.2015, when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the appellant was not ready and he sought for time. Hence, with a view to afford an opportunity, the matter was ordered to be listed today i.e., on 16.12.2015 after removing the caption for dismissal.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Even today, the learned counsel for the appellant
was not ready. It appears that he is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The I Additional Sub-Judge, Villupuram,
Villupuram District.
2. The Additional District Munsif, Villupuram,
Villupuram District.
S.A.No.475 of 2015
ca co
kra 05.01.2016
Kuppusamy (died) represented by his Legal Representatives
M. Ramadass
R. Rangarajan
R. Latchumanan
R. Ramachandran
S. Nagamuthu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
