K.Pachayappan v. R.K.Margabandhu
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant was reported dead and no steps were taken to regularize the status of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was dismissed as abated. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 16.03.2015
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI
Second Appeal No.1489 of 2004
K.Pachayappan ...Appellant
Vs
R.K.Margabandhu
M.Kalyani ...Respondents
Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2004 made in
A.S.No.132 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Court,
Vellore confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.2003 made in
O.S.No.3 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Ranipet.
For Appellant : M/s.R.Subramanian
For Respondents : M/s.K.Thangavelu
J U D G M E N T
The sole appellant is reported to be dead. So far no steps is
taken. The second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
Consequently CMP No. 11697 of 2004 is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
- The Principal District Judge, Vellore.
- The Subordindate Judge, Ranipet.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Pachayappan
- respondent
R.K.Margabandhu
- respondent
M.Kalyani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court