Review application dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant had no representation before the court on the listing dates.
Review petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.04.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN
Review Application No.210 of 2013
N.Debora Indira Jaba Priya ... Applicant Vs. 1.Ibrahim Sha 2.K.Jalaluddin 3.K.Kamala Narayanan 4.Lalitha Venkatesh 5.Sir Raj & Co, Auctioneers, rep.by its Manager, having its Office at No.7, Sunkurama Chetty Street, Chennai – 600 001. 6.S.Ramkumar 7.D.Vijayakumar ... Respondents
Review Petition filed under Order 47, Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., praying to review the Judgment and Decree dated 19.11.2012 passed in A.S.No.195 of 2010 on the file of this Court and further for order of restitution of the schedule mentioned property in plaint in O.S.No.255 of 2007.
For Petitioner : No appearance
2
O R D E R
The case was listed on 02.03.2015 and on that day, there was
no representation for the applicant. Today also, there is no representation for the applicant. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
24.04.2015
Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no asvm
3
R.S.RAMANATHAN, J .
(asvm)
Order in
Rev.A.No.210 of 2013
24.04.2015
3 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Debora Indira Jaba Priya
Ibrahim Sha
K.Jalaluddin
K.Kamala Narayanan
Lalitha Venkatesh
Sir Raj & Co
THIRU JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
